IMPHAL, India, March 8 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: [1] Heard Mr. K. Achouba, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. H. Samarjit, learned G.A. assisted by Mr. L. Somorendro Roy, learned Jr. G.A. for the State respondent. [2] Order reserved. [3] Parties may submit brief written submission along with case law, if any, within one week. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
IMPHAL, India, March 8 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: On the joint request made by the counsel appearing for the parties, list these cases again on 27.02.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
IMPHAL, India, March 8 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: In view of the adjournment slip submitted by the parties, list these cases again on 30.03.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
IMPHAL, India, March 8 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: Ms. Saibiya Kh., learned counsel appeared on behalf of petitioner and Mrs. L. Monomala, learned GA appeared on behalf of respondents No. 1 & 2. The learned GA submitted that even though she accepts notice on behalf of respondents, she has been instructed to appear only on behalf of respondents No. 1 & 2 and that she cannot represent respondent No. 3. In view of the submission made above, let notice be issued to...
IMPHAL, India, March 8 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: Mr. Deepak Prasad Sahu, learned counsel appearing for the respondent nos. 1 & 2 seeks (three) weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Md. Ashif, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he has no objection. As prayed for, list these cases again on 01.04.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
IMPHAL, India, March 8 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: Mrs. L. Monomala, learned GA appearing for the respondents seeks 3 weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. Mr. B. Prem Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prays for fixing a short date. As prayed for, list these cases again on 01.04.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
IMPHAL, India, March 8 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: [1] Mrs. Ch. Sundari, learned GA for the State respondents submits that she may be given some time for arranging new counsel. [2] Mr. HS Paonam, learned sr. counsel assisted by Ms. H. Malemleima, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioners; Ms. Kh. Maria, learned counsel, Mr. M. Rendy, learned counsel, Mr. S. Biswajit, learned sr. counsel assisted by Mr. Sanatomba, learned counsel and Mr. I. Denning, learned c...
IMPHAL, India, March 8 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: Mr. Shyam Sharma, learned GA appeared on behalf of the respondent no. 1, 2 & 3; and Mr. Th. Mahira, learned counsel appeared on behalf of the respondent no. 4 to 9. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents seeks 3(three) weeks' time for counter affidavit. Ms. Anamika, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has no objection. As prayed for, list these cases again on 02.04.2026. Disclaimer: Cur...
IMPHAL, India, March 8 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: [1] Present Ms. Linda, learned counsel and Ms. Malemleima, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also present Mr. S. Niranjan, learned G.A. for the State respondent. [2] Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that the matter may be taken up after two weeks. [3] Learned G.A. has no objection. [4] List this case on 01.04.2026. [5] Earlier interim order is extended till the next date. Disclaimer: Curated...
IMPHAL, India, March 8 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: Ms. Lekhakumari, learned counsel appearing for the respondent no. 5 seeks 3(three) weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. This prayer is vehemently objected to by Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners by submitting that ample opportunity has been given to respondent no. 5 for filing counter affidavit. Be that as it may, as the appointment order of the respondent no. 5 has been assaile...