RANCHI, India, Dec. 26 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 26: 1. Heard both sides. 2. Aggrieved by the dismissal of the Original Application being O.A.051/00122/2015(R) by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna, vide order dated 5th February, 2016, the petitioner has filed the instant writ petition. 3. The petitioner had filed the Original Application praying therein, inter alia, for grant of following reliefs: "[8.a] For Issuance of a direction upon...
RANCHI, India, Dec. 26 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 26: 1. This writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction upon the respondents to extend the period of mining lease granted to the petitioner in terms of the order of sanction contained in Memo No. 287 dated 04.03.2016 issued under signature of the District Mining Officer, Koderma, (respondent no. 3) in respect to the land being Plot Nos. 672,691,671,673 and 690 (Part), measur...
RANCHI, India, Dec. 26 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 26: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioners are claiming upgradation of the pay scale from Grade-2 to Grade-3. 3. Learned senior counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have complied all the conditions but their cases have not been considered only on the ground that they have superannuated from services. He further submits that a decision was taken by the Government that the benefit of pay sc...
RANCHI, India, Dec. 26 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 26: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the instant writ petition has rendered infructuous with the efflux of time and, moreover, the writ petitioner has also died. 2. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of as being infructuous. 3. However, it is made clear that in case the legal heirs of the writ petitioner have any subsisting/surviving claim, they are at liberty to avail such rem...
RANCHI, India, Dec. 26 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 26: 1. This Criminal Appeal has been filed on behalf of the appellant under Section 101(5) of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, challenging the order dated 04.08.2025, passed in M.C.A. No. 1534 of 2025, by the learned Addl. Session Judge-I-cum-Special Judge (Children Court), Giridih, by which prayer for regular bail made on behalf of the appellant, Bittu Rai @ Bittu Kumar Rai @ Bittu Ku...
RANCHI, India, Dec. 26 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 26: 1. Earlier matter was referred for mediation vide order dated 31.07.2025. 2. As per the mediation report, matter has been amicably settled between the Insurance Company and the claimant. The terms of settlement have been jointly signed by both sides and annexed with the mediation report. 3. Under the circumstance, instant appeal is disposed in terms of settlement arrived at between the parties dated 30.10....
GUWAHATI, India, Dec. 26 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Nov. 26: 1. Heard Mr. K. N. Choudhury, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. N. N. B. Choudhury, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. H. Gupta, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No.1 and Mr. M. K. Choudhury, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. M. Sharma, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.2 to 6. 2. Taking into account the issue inv...
GUWAHATI, India, Dec. 26 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Nov. 26: 1. Heard Mr. K. N. Choudhury, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. N. N. B. Choudhury, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. H. Gupta, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No.1 and Mr. M. K. Choudhury, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. M. Sharma, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.2 to 6. 2. Taking into account the issue inv...
GUWAHATI, India, Dec. 26 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Nov. 26: 1. Heard Mr. S. Hoque, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner in the batch of the writ petitions and Mr. B. Gogoi, the learned Additional Advocate General, Assam appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. 2. Taking into account that the issue involved in all these 6 (six) writ petitions raises common question of law and fact, all are taken up for disposal by this common order. ...
GUWAHATI, India, Dec. 26 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Nov. 26: 1. Heard Mr. S. Hoque, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner in the batch of the writ petitions and Mr. B. Gogoi, the learned Additional Advocate General, Assam appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. 2. Taking into account that the issue involved in all these 6 (six) writ petitions raises common question of law and fact, all are taken up for disposal by this common order. ...