JABALPUR, India, March 11 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 9: 1. The instant intra court appeal has been preferred by the appellant being aggrieved by the order dated 21.08.2025 passed by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.20383/2016, whereby the writ petition preferred by respondent No.1 was allowed with a direction to the appellant to extend the benefit of third ACP on completion of 30 years of service, from the date of initial appointment. 2. H...
JABALPUR, India, March 11 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 9: 1. The appellant impugns order dated 13.11.2025, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant has been dismissed. 2. The appellant is a guest faculty and has now been declared as "fallen out" on account of regular posting in respective government college. The factual position was that no guest faculty was permitted to be replaced by a guest faculty and was permitted to be replaced by a re...
RANCHI, India, March 10 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, March 10 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The prayer of petitioners is to count their past services under the respondents. 3. It is the case of the petitioners that the petitioners were regularized only on 2023, however, they were working since November, 2008 but their past services have not been calculated for the purpose of considering their pensionary benefits. 4. The petitioners have worked for more than 14 year and ...
RANCHI, India, March 10 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: 1. Heard, learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner claims that he is entitled for over time allowance from January, 2005 to December, 2008 which has not been paid to him. 3. From the order at Annexure-01 of this writ petition as contained in Memo No. 1653 dated 04.08.2023, I find that the Managing Director, Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited has also directed to consider the case of the petitio...
RANCHI, India, March 10 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: 1. Learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition to file a departmental appeal. 2. Considering his submission, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to the petitioner to file a departmental appeal which would be considered on merits. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, March 10 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: 1. Heard, learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner is not the employee of State. Though the petitioner's place of working is at Sadar Hospital but yet the employer of the petitioner is one M/s Shiv Lal, N.G.O., Sadar Hospital who is a manpower supply agency. 3. The petitioner in this writ petition has prayed to set aside the order of termination and take back the petitioner in service. 4. Admit...
RANCHI, India, March 10 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs :- "(a) for issuance of an appropriate writ, order, or direction, including Writ of Mandamus, commanding upon Respondent No.2 to take a decision on the representation made by the petitioner that has been pending since 07.01.2025 (Annexure-4) wherein request has been made for release of JCB Machin...
RANCHI, India, March 10 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: 1. Heard the parties. 2. This is a case of certiorari. Thus, it is not necessary to call for a counter-affidavit from the respondents. 3. The petitioner seeks to quash Annexure-12, which is a Communication dated 04.09.2025 by which the claim of compassionate appointment of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that he is aged more than 35 years. 4. After going through the records, I find that th...
RANCHI, India, March 10 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 9: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner claims that she is the mother of the deceased-employee, namely, Late Takenarayan Kumar and after his death, the petitioner is entitled to get the retiral benefits. She also prays that daughter of this petitioner may be considered for compassionate appointment. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Central Coalfields Limited submits that there is rival claim a...