RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard Mr Abhay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr Gaurav Raj, learned A.C. to A.A.G-II for the State. 2. This petition challenges the Jharkhand Society Registration Rules, 2025 (the said Rules), on the grounds that the said Rules are ultra vires the parent act i.e. the Societies Registration Act, 1860, as applicable to the State of Jharkhand. 3. On 29.04.2026, when this matter was fi...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. By adopting the reasoning in our order dated 28.04.2026 disposing of W.P (C) No. 2610 of 2026 (M/s Shiv Jyoti Stone Minerals versus The State of Jharkhand and others), we dismiss this petition. In M/s Shiv Jyoti Stone Minerals (Supra), we have held that the authorities dealing with applications under Rule 23(1) of the Jharkhand Mineral Concession Rules, 2004...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the judgment dated 21.01.2019 (Annexure-6) passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Ranchi in Bihar Shops & Establishment Case No. 10 of 2016 whereby the petition filed by the original petitioner under section 26 of the Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, 1953, has been dismissed. ...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the parties agree that the issue in this petition stands covered by our order dated 07.04.2026, disposing of W.P.(T) No. 2270 of 2026 (M/s Ranjan Construction Vs. Union of India & Ors.). Therefore, by adopting the reasonings in the above referred order, we dispose of this petition, by granting the petitioner liberty to challenge the impugned...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs; (i) For issuance of appropriate writ(s), order(s), and/or direction, including a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing order of punishment contained in Notification No. 1736 dated 27.04.2022 (Annexure-6 to the writ application), by which warning has been awarded t...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. The instant application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for quashing the order dated 14.07.2021(Annexure-9); whereby his request of reinstatement has been rejected on 14.07.2021. 2. The petitioner has further prayed for his reinstatement with back wages with all consequential benefits. 3. The brief facts of the case is that the Inquiry officer submitted his enquiry report & charges l...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard the parties. 2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that possession of his land has been illegally taken by respondent Nos.6 to 16. The petitioner thus, has approached this Court for a direction upon the State to ensure removal of the aforesaid illegal occupation of respondent Nos.6 to 16. 3. The relief which the petitioner is claiming, cannot be granted in an application under Article 226 of the...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard the parties. 2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the petitioner has applied for Arms license under the Arms Act before the appropriate authority, but no decision upon his application has yet been taken. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that suffice it would be if the direction is given to the respondents to take a final decision on the application of the pe...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner is claiming title over the land in Mouza No. 35, Sadha Marney and Bara Mouza bearing Jamabandi No. 36 (old) and 35 (new), Plot No. 01 recording mentioned in Rakha Jungle total area 60 acres in which the part of 07 acres and 70 decimals as he said that he had developed the said land for agricultural purpose and he is in possession of the same for 70 years. The petitioner...
India, June 3 -- The Government of India has issued a release: The Vice President of India, Shri C. P. Radhakrishnan, has expressed deep sorrow over the loss of lives in the fire incident in Malviya Nagar, Delhi. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....