RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This appeal challenges the learned Single Judge's order dated 16th April, 2024. 3. The learned Single Judge has correctly held that the revenue authorities cannot decide on the issues of title and since such issues of title were sought to be raised in the mutation proceedings, the learned Single Judge did not permit the same. 4. According to us, there is no err...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. I.A. No.12627 of 2025 seeks condonation of delay of 170 days in instituting this appeal. 3. Considering the reasons set out, we condone the delay and dispose of the aforesaid I.A. 4. At the request and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the appeal is taken up for hearing. 5. The appellant seeks compassionate appointment with the respondents b...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This appeal is directed against the learned Single Judge's order dated 03.11.2025 dismissing the petitioner's/appellant's W.P. (S) No. 5930 of 2025 by which the petitioner was in fact, seeking condonation of delay for document verification in the context of Jharkhand Laboratory Assistant Competitive Examination, 2023 in terms of Advertisement No. 01/2023. 3. The ...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. The instant appeal under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is directed against judgment of conviction dated 07.04.1998 and the order of sentence dated 13.04.1998 passed by the learned 5 th Addl. Sessions Judge, Hazaribagh in Sessions Trial No. 105 of 1991 whereby and whereunder the appellants, named above, have been convicted under sections 148, 302/34 and 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and s...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: I.A. No. 5519 of 2026 Heard Mrs. Nitu Sinha, learned counsel for the appellant and none appears on behalf of the State. 2. This application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning the delay of 25 days in filing the appeal. 3. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the delay of 25 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned. 4. I.A. ...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This revision has been filed by petitioner/informant for setting aside the order dated 06.08.2018 wherein the learned court of Juvenile Justice Board, Palamau at Daltonganj has released all accused persons i.e. opposite party No. 2 to 4 after due admonition in Pandu P.S. Case No. 04 of 2018 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 318 of 2018. 3. Learned counsel appearing ...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. The present appeal is directed against the Judgment of conviction dated 30.11.2018 and order of sentence dated 01.12.2018, passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Pakur, in Sessions Trial No.45 of 2017, arising out of Littipara P.S. Case No.22 of 2015 (G.R. No.338 of 2015), whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 370(2) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and has been senten...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs; i) For quashing of Memo No.603 dated 14.12.2023 [Annexure-3] issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro whereby the application of petitioner has been rejected to reinstate in service in the light of judgement dated 16.10.2020 [Annexure-1] passed in WP(S) No.6436/2010 with...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs; i) For quashing of Memo No.603 dated 14.12.2023 [Annexure-3] issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro whereby the application of petitioner has been rejected to reinstate in service in the light of judgement dated 16.10.2020 [Annexure-1] passed in WP(S) No.6436/2010 with...
RANCHI, India, June 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 4: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is having no instructions from his client, as such he is unable to press this writ application. 2. However, looking to the prayer made in this writ application and the nature of punishment, this Court proceeds to decide this case on merit. 3. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner, praying therein for quashing of Memo No. 2494 ...