RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The description of land, as disclosed by the petitioner, is as follows :- "Mouza - Kalimati (Jamshedpur), Khata No.90, Thana No.1163, Plot No.548, Area - 0.025 decimal, PS - Ghatshila, East Singhbhum (Jamshedpur)." 3. The petitioner is praying for settlement, but as per the report, the order, as contained in Annexure - 4 to the writ petition, suggests that it i...
RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file fresh one by individual person since the claim is individual. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents have raised no objection. 3. With the aforesaid liberty, the present writ petition is, hereby, disposed of. 4. Pending interlocutory application, if any, stands disposed of. Disclaimer: Cur...
RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: 1. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs :- "(a) for issuance of an appropriate writ, order, or direction, specifically a writ in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the Respondent No. 2 (The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi) to hear and dispose of the pending Mutation Revision Case No. 54R15/2025-26 (titled Mukesh Nag vs. Smt. Prachi), as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a ...
RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- i For Issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction commanding the Respondents, particularly the authorities of Tata Steel Utilities and Infrastructure Services Limited (JUSCO) and Jharkhand Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited (JBVNL), to immediately disconnect the illegal water and electricity connections obtained by Res...
RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "For a direction upon the Respondent no. 1 to immediately and expeditiously decide the case being S.A. No. 31/2025 without any further adjournments order delay." 3. The writ is being maintained because the D.R.T is not functional. For the purpose of interim protection i.e. for protecting the lis, in the present ca...
RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- a. For a writ of mandamus or any other writ of the same nature declaring the investigation carried out by the Respondent No.2 in Case No. 48 & 49 of 2020 titled Bharat Coking Coal Ltd. v. Dhansar Engineering Co. Private Ltd. & Ors. as being unconstitutional and unlawful. b. For a writ of certiorari or any other writ ...
GUWAHATI, India, March 8 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 5: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The above noted writ petitions having been instituted assailing the communication dated 10-02-2022 issued by the Managing Director, Assam Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. and the grounds of challenge being one and the same, the said writ petitions, as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties were ta...
GUWAHATI, India, March 8 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 5: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The above noted writ petitions having been instituted assailing the communication dated 10-02-2022 issued by the Managing Director, Assam Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. and the grounds of challenge being one and the same, the said writ petitions, as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties were ta...
GUWAHATI, India, March 8 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 5: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The above noted writ petitions having been instituted assailing the communication dated 10-02-2022 issued by the Managing Director, Assam Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. and the grounds of challenge being one and the same, the said writ petitions, as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties were ta...
GUWAHATI, India, March 8 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 5: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The above noted writ petitions having been instituted assailing the communication dated 10-02-2022 issued by the Managing Director, Assam Mineral Development Corporation Ltd. and the grounds of challenge being one and the same, the said writ petitions, as agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties were ta...