AMARAVATI, India, March 8 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on Feb. 5: 1. The above contempt case was filed complaining of a violation of the order dated 14.08.2024, passed in W.P.No.17798 of 2024. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on both sides. 3. The petitioner filed the aforementioned writ petition complaining that the respondents 4 & 5 i.e. the Mandal Parishad Development Officer and the Assistant Project Officer, are preventing the petitioner from performing her...
AMARAVATI, India, March 8 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on Feb. 5: 1. The above contempt case was filed complaining of a violation of the order dated 14.08.2024, passed in W.P.No.17803 of 2024. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on both sides. 3. The petitioner filed the aforementioned writ petition complaining that the respondents 4 & 5 i.e. the Mandal Parishad Development Officer and the Assistant Project Officer, are preventing the petitioner from performing her...
AMARAVATI, India, March 8 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on Feb. 5: 1. The above contempt case was filed complaining of the violation of the order dated 09.07.2024, passed in W.P.No.7266 of 2024. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing on both sides. 3. The petitioner filed the aforementioned writ petition to declare the action of the respondents in not settling the pension, gratuity, CVP and other retirement benefits. The writ petition was disposed of on 09.07.2024. The...
AMARAVATI, India, March 8 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on Feb. 5: 1. A learned Judge of this Court by an order dated 12.02.2020 disposed of the Writ Petition No.20074 of 2016 with a direction to the respondents therein to reckon services of the writ petitioners five years after their joining into service and award all consequential benefits, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. 2. Seeking review of the said orders, the...
AMARAVATI, India, March 8 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on Feb. 5: 1. No representation on behalf of the petitioners, even today also, though the matter is listed under the caption "for Dismissal". Be that as it may. 2. This Court vide Order dated 22.01.2026, dismissed the main Writ Petition No.21604 of 2019. 3. In view of the same, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Synd...
AMARAVATI, India, March 8 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on Feb. 5: 1. A learned Judge of this Court by an order dated 12.02.2020 disposed of the Writ Petition No.20129 of 2016 with a direction to the respondents therein to reckon services of the writ petitioners five years after their joining into service and award all consequential benefits, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. 2. Seeking review of the said orders, the...
PATNA, India, March 8 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Feb. 5: 1. The instant appeal has been preferred by the appellants against the judgment of conviction dated 21.01.2014 and the order of sentence dated 27.01.2014 passed by the Court of the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-IV, Gopalganj, in Sessions Trial No. 290 of 2009/91 of 2011 (arising out of Kuchaikote P.S. Case No. 01 of 2008), whereby and whereunder the appellants have been convicted for the offences p...
PATNA, India, March 8 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Feb. 5: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following relief(s):- "That the present writ application is being filed by the petitioner for issuance of direction to the respondent authorities for pre-mature release of the father of the petitioner namely Dhirendra Sharma @ Dhirendra Kumar, who is in judicial custody since 2010 in connection with Ghos...
PATNA, India, March 8 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Feb. 5: 1. Learned counsel Mr. Yash Raj Singh appears and submits that inadvertently the name of learned counsel Mr. Vijay Anand who represents Economic Offence Unit is being shown in the cause list though the Economic Offence Unit is not party in the present writ petition. 2. Office is directed to correct the same. 3 Heard learned counsel for the parties and I intend to dispose of the petition at this stage. 4. Th...
PATNA, India, March 8 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Feb. 5: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and I intend to dispose of the petition at this stage. 2. No counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of State-respondents or the Union of India. 3. The petitioner has approached this Court seeking following relief(s):- "(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities to release the car vehicle b...