JABALPUR, India, March 8 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 5: The corpus has been produced by Shri Rahul Kutre Sub-Divisional Police Officer with Ms. Rashmi Jain, Sub-Inspector, Shri Dayaram Chakrawarti, Sub-Inspector and Ms. Sunita Chauhan, Lady Constable, P.S. Chanderi District-Tikamgarh in Court. Learned Government Advocate has produced the police record. The police authorities have obtained the Class Xth Certificate as well as the scholar register of ...
JABALPUR, India, March 8 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 6: Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in case the complaints given by the petitioner are treated as a representation by the Chief Medical and Health Officer, Satna, he will be satisfied. In view of the above, this petition is disposed of directing the Chief Medical and Health Officer, Satna to consider the complaints of petitioner as a representation and take a view in the matter. Let the...
JABALPUR, India, March 8 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 6: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. At request, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, March 8 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 6: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition with the liberty to approach the learned Arbitrator. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as aforesaid. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, March 8 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 6: Petitioner impugns circular dated 09.05.2022 as well as demand notice dated 18.11.2025, whereby the petitioner has been directed to pay dead rent. The challenge is on the ground that no mining operations could be undertaken due to lack of Bhupravesh Permission and Environmental Clearance. The issue raised by the petitioner is squarely covered by the judgment of a co-ordinate Bench of this Court...
JABALPUR, India, March 8 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 6: Learned counsel for petitioners submits that in view of the subsequent action taken by the respondents, petition has become infructuous, she accordingly seeks leave to withdraw the same. Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, March 8 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 6: 1. Corpus has been produced in Court by Shri Rajkumar Shukla, ASI of Police Station, Gourihar, District Chhatarpur and Ms. Sandhya Sharma, Constable-1592 of 6th Battalion, Jabalpur. She states that she wishes to reside with the petitioner. 2. In view of the above, petition is disposed of. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: I.A. No. 16833 of 2025 1. Heard Mr. Mayank Mohit Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned A.P.P. 2. This application has been preferred by the appellant for grant of bail during the pendency of the appeal. The appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the IPC and has been sentenced undergo R.I. for life along with the fine of Rs. 20,000/-. 3. It has been alleg...
RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: I.A. No. 17084 of 2025 1. Heard Mr. Vishnu Prabhakar Pathak, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and learned A.P.P. 2. This interlocutory application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning the delay of 05 days in filing the appeal. 3. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the delay of 05 days in filing the appeal is hereby co...
RANCHI, India, March 8 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Feb. 6: I. A. No. 16094 of 2025: Heard Mr. Prem Mardi, learned counsel for the appellants and learned Special P.P. for the State. This interlocutory application has been preferred by the appellants for condoning the delay of 54 days in filing this appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 54 days in filing this appeal is hereby condoned. I. ...