GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. Heard Mr. B. K. Mahajan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the accusedapplicant. Also heard Mr. R. J. Baruah, learned Addl. P.P., representing the State and Mr. J. Sehgal, learned counsel appearing for the Informant. 2. This is an application filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023, praying for granting bail to the accused-applicant in connection with Teok Police Station Case No. 146/2025, registered u...
GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. Heard Mr. P. Bhowmick, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. K. P. Pathak, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3. 2. The Petitioner herein which is a company engaged in the business of plantation, manufacture and sale of black tea had assailed the order dated 19.09.2017 passed in Review Petition No.1/2017 as well as the Bill dated 03...
GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. The instant writ petition is filed by the petitioner challenging the non-payment of the admitted amount of Rs.10,08,000/- by the Respondent Authorities to the petitioner for the works executed by the petitioner. 2. The case of the petitioner herein is that the petitioner has been allotted the works vide work orders dated 17.06.2015, 02.05.2015 and 07.02.2018 issued by the respondent No.2. The total value ...
GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. Heard Mr. O. P. Bhati, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in the instant batch of writ petitions. Mr. P. Nayak, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the PWD who have been arrayed as respondents in the instant proceedings. PREFACE 2. All the writ petitions are filed by the same petitioner who claims that he is a Class-I registered contractor with the Public Works Department of ...
GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. Heard Mr. O. P. Bhati, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in the instant batch of writ petitions. Mr. P. Nayak, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the PWD who have been arrayed as respondents in the instant proceedings. PREFACE 2. All the writ petitions are filed by the same petitioner who claims that he is a Class-I registered contractor with the Public Works Department of ...
GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. Heard Mr. O. P. Bhati, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in the instant batch of writ petitions. Mr. P. Nayak, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the PWD who have been arrayed as respondents in the instant proceedings. PREFACE 2. All the writ petitions are filed by the same petitioner who claims that he is a Class-I registered contractor with the Public Works Department of ...
GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. Heard Mr. O. P. Bhati, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in the instant batch of writ petitions. Mr. P. Nayak, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the PWD who have been arrayed as respondents in the instant proceedings. PREFACE 2. All the writ petitions are filed by the same petitioner who claims that he is a Class-I registered contractor with the Public Works Department of ...
GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. Heard Mr. O. P. Bhati, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in the instant batch of writ petitions. Mr. P. Nayak, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the PWD who have been arrayed as respondents in the instant proceedings. PREFACE 2. All the writ petitions are filed by the same petitioner who claims that he is a Class-I registered contractor with the Public Works Department of ...
GUWAHATI, India, April 1 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 27: 1. Heard Mr. S. Das, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. S. Barooah, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This is an appeal preferred under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the judgment dated 09.09.2010, passed by the learned Civil Judge No.3, Kamrup at Guwahati in Title Appeal No. 68/2008, whereby the judgment and decree dated 18.08.2008, passed by the learned Munsiff...
CUTTACK, India, April 1 -- Orissa High Court issued the following order on Jan. 13 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No. 10772 of 2025 Anuja Kanhar ... Petitioner Mr. M. Das, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha ... Opposite Party Mr. R.B. Mishra, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. 03 ORDER (ORAL) 13.01.2026 This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). Mr. Mahesh Das, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of the Court to...