RANCHI, India, Aug. 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 9: 1. Heard both sides. 2. This Criminal Revision Application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner challenging the judgment dated 17.07.2018 passed in Cr. Appeal No.133 of 2017 by learned Sessions Judge, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur, whereby the appeal has been dismissed thereby affirming the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 15.09.2017 passed by Sri Shivendu Dwivedi, learned Judicial Magistr...
RANCHI, India, Aug. 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 9: 1. I.A. No.972 of 2025 has been filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to condone delay of 580 days in filing the LPA challenging the judgment dated 5th December, 2022 passed in W.P.(S) No.5277 of 2011 by the learned Single Judge. 2. Though it is stated in the application for condonation of delay that the applicant is an aged person and that he was suffering from severe backache with cellubis of bot...
RANCHI, India, Aug. 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 9: 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants and learned counsel appearing for the respondent - Railway. 2. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment dated 10.11.2022 passed by learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Ranchi Bench in Case No. OA(IIU) RNC/37/2019 (Checklist No.2905190004) in an application under Section 16 of Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 whereby the claim made by the appellants ...
RANCHI, India, Aug. 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 9: 1. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that inadvertently the appeal has been filed before this Court in light of Order XLIII Rule (1)(r) of the C.P.C., however, in light of the pecuniary jurisdiction, the appeal will lie before the learned District Judge and in view of that the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the instant appeal with liberty to move b...
RANCHI, India, Aug. 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 9: 1. Mrs. Nisha Pandey, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant has sought for leave of this Court to accept the supplementary affidavit dated 09.07.2025 which has been filed in pursuance to the order dated 10.06.2025. 2. Leave, as prayed for, is granted. 3. Let the said affidavit be taken on record. 4. It is evident from the said supplementary affidavit that the parties have settled their disputes b...
JABALPUR, India, Aug. 6 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on July 10: 1. Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition, reserving the right of the petitioner to approach the Delhi High Court for the subject relief. 2. Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. 3. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Aug. 6 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on July 10: Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Aug. 6 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on July 10: 1. Petitioners impugn an award dated 02.06.2025 (Annexure P-8) passed by the respondent No.3 in Case No.055/B-121/25-26 under the National Highways Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). 2. Since petitioners are aggrieved by the award, petitioners have the alternative remedy under Section 3G(6) of the Act, which stipulates that the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,...
JABALPUR, India, Aug. 6 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on July 10: Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition reserving the right of the petitioner to take alternative remedy is in law. Petition, is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Aug. 6 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on July 10: In the instant writ petition, petitioner submits that her land was acquired as far back in the year 2014 and till date the proceedings have not been finalized and full compensation has not been received by the petitioner. We note that the proceedings have been pending since the year 2014. In view of the above, we direct the Collector-cum-Arbitrator to dispose of the proceedings as expeditiou...