GUWAHATI, India, Aug. 6 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on July 10: 1. Heard Mr. A. Chaudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. M Kechii, learned Additional Advocate General, Nagaland. 2. This application under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the petitioner, namely, Guneshwar Bharali @ Guneswar Bharali, who is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dimapur Sub-Urban P.S. Case No. 23/2025 under Sections 318(4)/316(5)/61(2) of BNS. 3. The gis...
GUWAHATI, India, Aug. 6 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on July 10: 1. Heard Mr. S. Banik, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. K. Baishya, learned APP for the State. 2. Apprehending arrest in connection with CID P.S. Case No.11/2025 under Sections 61(2)/319(2)/318(4) of the BNS, 2023, the petitioner namely, Sri Angelus Baxla has filed this pre-arrest bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. 2. Let the scanned copy of the case diary be produced on...
GUWAHATI, India, Aug. 6 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on July 10: Let the scanned copy of the case diary along with the post-mortem report and report on examination of viscera be produced on the next date of listing. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, Aug. 6 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on July 10: 1. Heard Mr. S. Borthakur, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S.H. Bora, learned APP for the State. 2. Apprehending arrest in connection with Silapathar P.S. Case No.130/2025 under Sections 61(2)/318(4)/ 316(5) of the BNS, 2023, the petitioner namely, Smti. Jinti Buragohain Chutia has filed this pre-arrest bail application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. 2. The learned counsel for the pet...
GUWAHATI, India, Aug. 6 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on July 10: List on 16.07.2025 as prayed for by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, Aug. 6 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on July 10: 1. Heard Mr. S. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. S. H. Bora, learned APP for the State. 2. By filing this application under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023, the petitioner has prayed for pre-arrest bail in connection with Jorhat P.S. Case No. 209/2025, under section 69 of the BNS, 2023. 3. Let the scanned copy of the case diary along with the medical report of the victim, if available...
RANCHI, India, Aug. 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 9: 1. The petitioners are before this Court for direction to the respondents to pay adequate compensation from the date of dispossession of the petitioners from their Raiyati land under Khata Nos. 07, 10 and 17, Plot Nos. 4/582, 19 and 05, total area 93 decimals which has been taken over by the respondents for widening of road. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that there had been wide...
RANCHI, India, Aug. 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 9: 1. I have already heard the arguments advanced by Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Tiwari, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. T.N. Jha, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. This instant second appeal has been preferred by the appellant being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree dated 17.02.2011 (signed on 07.03.2011) passed by learned Additional District Judge, F.T.C.-I, Garhwa i...
RANCHI, India, Aug. 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 9: On the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Aug. 6 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on July 9: 1. Nobody appears on behalf of petitioner as well as on behalf of opposite parties. 2. It appears from the order sheet that on earlier two occasions also on 27.02.2025 and 08.04.2025, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Under the aforesaid circumstances, it appears that the petitioner has lost his interest in this case. 4. Accordingly, the present civil revision is dismissed for default. Discl...