RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: 1. The petitioner has prayed for the following relief. "For issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ/Order for quashing the Impugned Order dated 15.03.2025 passed by respondent No.3 (Annexure-4) in Mutation Case No:5006R-27 of 2024-25 whereby and whereunder the application filed by the Petitioner for mutation in respect of a piece of land measuring an area of 3.22 decimals,...
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: Heard the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file an appeal under Section 17 of the Payment of Wages Act. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition on the instruction of his client. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This purported public interest litigation seeks the dismissal of the 5th respondent, a Panchayat Secretary, Block Raneshwar, District-Dumka. 3. We are extremely doubtful whether a public interest litigation would lie to seek such reliefs. In any event, the learned counsel for the petitioner now says that the 5th respondent has since expired. 4. Accordingly, eve...
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner, by instituting this public interest litigation has complained about encroachments on government property described as plot numbers 206, 207, 208 and 209 corresponding to Khata No.172 at Porahat, Chakradharpur, District-West Singhbhum. 3. The allegation in the public interest litigation was that no action is being taken by the respondents to remove...
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: Heard the parties. Learned senior counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Appeal with liberty to file a bail application. Permission is accorded. This Criminal Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty to the appellant. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: I.A. No.4421 of 2025 Heard the parties. No one turns up on behalf of the intervener in spite of repeated calls. Accordingly, this interlocutory application is rejected as not pressed. Cr.M.P. No.809 of 2025 Perusal of the record reveals that vide order dated 06.12.2025 prayer for time was allowed as the last chance and today also learned counsel for the petitioner again prays for time. Prayer for time ...
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant seeks permission of this court to withdraw this appeal. P ermission is accorded. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants seek permission of this court to withdraw this appeal. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of the withdrawal of this appeal, pending interlocutory application, if any, is disposed of being infructuous. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: 1. This petition was at serial No. 2 on today's cause list and was therefore called out in its turn. 2. Learned counsel for the review petitioners sought for some accommodation/pass over and the matter was therefore posted after half an hour. 3. The learned counsel who sought a passover has not bothered to appear. Instead, some other lawyer appeared and requested that the matter be kept until 2:15 PM. 4. ...