RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: 1. This case has been listed under the heading for Orders as there are defects. 2. This case was filed on 14.05.2024 with defects. 3. The matter was listed before the Lawazima Board on 13.09.2024. No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner on that date inspite of that time was granted to remove the defects. As the defects were not removed, again the matter was listed before the Lawazima Board on 10.09.2025...
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: 1. Office is directed to register this case immediately. Later on 2. This case has been registered as W.P. (C) No. 2148 of 2026. W.P. (C) No. 2148 of 2026 3. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. 4. This case has been listed today under the heading for 'Orders' to decide on the point of maintainability. 5. I have gone through the writ petition. This petition has been filed by the petitioner pray...
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: 1. Office is directed to register this case immediately. Later on 2. This case has been registered as W.P. (C) No. 2147 of 2026. W.P. (C) No. 2147 of 2026 3. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. 4. This case has been listed today under the heading for 'Orders' to decide on the point of maintainability. 5. I have gone through the writ petition. This petition has been filed by the petitioner prayin...
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: 1. Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the respondents. 2. In this case the petitioner prayed that re-examination of paper-I and paper-II of the Semester-I of his M.Phil examination be directed to be taken as on the date when the examination was conducted he had his LLB entrance examination and he choose to appear in the LLB entrance examination, he could...
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: 1. Heard the learned counsel representing the petitioner and the learned counsel representing the respondents. 2. The petitioner, in this writ petition, has prayed for following reliefs: - i) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s) and direction(s) to the Respondent No.3. Deputy Commissioner, Godda to issue certified copy of order dated 22.05.1995 along with entire order sheet passed in T.L Case No. ...
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: 1. Heard the parties. 2. It is the grievance of the petitioner that for the same nature of land, the petitioner has been paid a less amount of compensation, though his brother has received more. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the NHAI submits that the land has been acquired in terms of the provision of National Highways Act, 1956. It is his contention that the petitioner should approach the appro...
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: 1. Learned counsel representing the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ application to seek alternative remedy, if any, available to the petitioner. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, May 1 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 30: 1. It is the grievance of the petitioner that the land was recorded in the name of the grandfather of the petitioner but now in the online records the same has been shown to be recorded in the name of one Bechu Mian, son of Fagu Mian which is an erroneous entry. It is the grievance of the petitioner that on the basis of aforesaid wrong recording those persons are selling the land of the petitioner. It is his co...