RANCHI, India, Feb. 9 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 9: 1. Ms. Shivani Jaluka, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh writ on the fresh cause of action. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Pending I.A., if any, stands disposed of. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Feb. 9 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 9: 1. The present interlocutory application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition as the same has become infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the State has raised no objection. 3. Accordingly, I.A. No.16754 of 2025 is, hereby, allowed. 4. Consequently, the present writ petition being W.P.(C) No.5241 of 2025 stands dismissed as withdraw...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 9 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 9: 1. Heard Mr. Sahil, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Sunil Kr. Dubey, learned APP for the State. None appears for the Informant even today. 2. Although, notice was issued upon the Informant on 12.08.2025 but the Informant did not appear on 14.10.2025, and 27.11.2025. 3. The Present Criminal Appeal has been filed under section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrociti...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 9 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 9: I.A. No.17085 of 2025 1. Heard Mr. Vishnu Prabhakar Pathak, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning the delay of 28 days in filing of this appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the delay of 28 days in filing this appeal is hereby, condoned. ...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 9 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 9: I.A. No.16967 of 2025 1. Heard Mrs. Juhi Kumari, learned counsel for the appellant and learned P.P. for the State. 2. This application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning the delay of 27 days in filing of this appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the delay of 27 days in filing this appeal is hereby, condoned. 3. I.A. No.16...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 9 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 9: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. The appellant is seeking condonation of delay of 911 days in filing this Letters Patent Appeal. 3. The only cause shown is that the appellant had paucity of funds and therefore, could not approach this Court earlier. 4. The learned counsel for the appellant further pointed out that the issue raised in this appeal is already decided against the appellant by t...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 9 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 9: 1. Heard Mr. S. Biswas, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. J. K. Goswami, the learned Government Advocate who appears on behalf of the respondents. 2. The petitioner herein has approached this Court seeking a writ in the nature of certiorari to set aside the impugned order dated 07.12.2023 passed by the respondent No.3 and further seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus thereby d...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 9 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 9: 1. Heard Mr. R. Borah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Ms. S. Baruah, the learned CGC, who appears on behalf of the respondents. 2. The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the rejection of the petitioner's candidature on the ground that the petitioner's height is below the prescribed limit. 3. The facts of the instant case as is apparent from the materials on record is that in pursu...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 9 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 9: 1. Heard Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned Standing counsel, APDCL for the petitioner. Also heard Dr. A.K. Saraf, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. D Goswami, learned counsel for the respondent no.2. 2. This writ petition has been filed by the Assam Power Distribution Company Ltd. (hereinafter referred to APDCL) challenging the impugned judgment dated 15.11.2022 passed by the Electricity Ombudsman in Appeal Petitio...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 9 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 9: 1. Heard Dr. A.K. Saraf, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. D Goswami, learned counsel for the Petitioners. Also heard Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned Standing counsel APDCL. The learned counsels, who also appear for the contesting parties in WP(C) 749/2023 had submitted that the orders passed in WP(C) no 749/2023 would have bearing in writ petition and therefore WP(C) 749/2023 was first taken up for adjudication. ...