PATNA, India, Feb. 12 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 12: 1. Heard the parties. 2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Maigra P.S. Case No. 84 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 65(1) of the B.N.S and Section 4 of the POCSO Act. 3. The main submissions advanced by the petitioner's counsel are that the victim has not supported the prosecution's allegations made in the FIR before the Judicial Magistrate while recording her statemen...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No. 484 of 2025 Prasanna Badini and Others - Revisionists Versus State of Uttarakhand and Others - Respondents Presence: Sri Piyush Tiwari, learned counsel for the Revisionists. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, assisted by Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand. Sri Yogesh Upadhyay, learned co...
PATNA, India, Feb. 12 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 12: 1. Heard Mr. Digvijay Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Nirmala Kumari, learned APP for the State. 2. As prayed on behalf of the petitioner, put up this case on 13.01.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Revision No. 192 of 2023 Manorama Mathur - Revisionist Versus Raj Singh Chhetri Alias Indra Bahadur Chhetri and Another - Respondents Present: Ms. Gayatri Puri, Mr. Narender Yadav, and Mr. Jayant Singh Chauhan, learned counsel for the revisionist/plaintiff. Mr. Siddhartha Singh and Mr. Priyanshu Gairola, learned counsel for the respondent. Hon'ble Mr. Ju...
PATNA, India, Feb. 12 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 12: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Informant and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 329(3), 115(2) & 109 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and under Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. The case of the prosecution is that one Rohit @ Mandan has fired at the husband of the in...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 6: HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Revision No. 100 of 2025 06 January, 2026 Anupama Prakash - Revisionist Versus Anirudh Singh and others - Respondents Presence: Mr. Vishesh Srivastava, learned counsel for the revisionist. Mr. Aditya Singh, learned counsel for the respondents. Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. The instant revision has been preferred by the defendant against the order dated 15.09...
PATNA, India, Feb. 12 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on Jan. 12: 1. Heard Mr. Digvijay Kumar Ojha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Nirmala Kumari, learned APP for the State. 2. As prayed on behalf of the petitioner, put up this case on 13.01.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 06TH JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2456 of 2025 Shadab - Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand - Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Siddhartha Tomar, Advocate (through video conferencing) Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Akshay Latwal, Assistant Government Advocate Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. The ...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 6th JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1854 of 2025 Baljeet Singh - Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand - Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Mehboob Rahi, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Brief Holder. Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. Applicant Baljeet Singh is in judicial custo...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 12 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 6: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 06TH JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1652 of 2025 Habib - Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand - Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Pradeep Lohani, Brief Holder. Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. Applicant Habib is in judicial custody for th...