MUMBAI, India, July 24 -- Reserve Bank of India issued the following press release: (Amount in ₹ crore, Rate in Per cent) MONEY MARKETS@ Volume (One Leg) Weighted Average Rate Range A. Overnight Segment (I+II+III+IV) 6,03,403.84 5.73 4.75-6.75 I. Call Money 17,346.55 5.73 4.75-5.85 II. Triparty Repo 4,04,014.05 5.72 5.30-5.82 III. Market Repo 1,79,687.94 5.75 5.20-5.90 IV. Repo in Corporate Bond 2,355.30 5.91 5.85-6.75 B. Term Segment I. Notice Money** 131.54 5.46 5.00-5.82 II. T...
RANCHI, India, July 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 23: Ms. Micky Kumari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on instruction of Mr. Anuj Kumar, who is Advocate-on-Record, seeks permission to withdraw this petition. 2. Ms. Komal Tiwary, learned counsel appearing for the State has got no objection. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, July 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 23: 1. Since the issue in this writ petition (PIL) relates to a service matter, in view of the judgment of Supreme Court in Dr. Duryodhan Sahu and Ors v. Jitendra Kumar Mishra and Ors in 1998(7)SCC 273, this PIL is not maintainable. 2. Accordingly, this writ petition (PIL) is dismissed. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, July 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 23: Heard the parties. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this acquittal appeal with liberty to approach the appropriate court with the selfsame relief. This acquittal appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, July 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 23: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute, hence, she seeks permission to withdraw this transfer petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. This transfer petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, July 23 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 23: 1. Mr. Dilip Kumar Jaiswal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instruction, seeks permission to withdraw this petition. 2. Mr. Vincent Rohit Marki, learned counsel appearing for opposite party nos. 1 and 2 has got no serious objection. 3. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Interim order, if any granted by this Court, is vacated. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, July 23 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on June 24: 1. Heard Mr. J. Laskar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mr. M. J. Quadir, the learned counsel who appears on behalf of the respondents. 2. The instant Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'the Code') challenging the judgment and decree passed by the learned Court of the Civil Judge, Hailakandi (hereinafter referred to as 'the learned ...
GUWAHATI, India, July 23 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on June 24: 1. Heard Mr. B.D. Deka, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1. 2. This second appeal, under Section 100 of the CPC, is directed against the judgment and decree dated 30.05.2022, passed by the learned Civil Judge No. 2, Kamrup(M) at Guwahati, in Title Appeal No. 51/2016. 2.1. It is to be noted here that vide impugned judgment and decree dated 30...
GUWAHATI, India, July 23 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on June 24: 1. Heard Mr. B.D. Deka, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. S. Chauhan, learned counsel for the respondent No.1. 2. This second appeal, under Section 100 of the CPC, is directed against the judgment and decree dated 01.06.2022, passed by the learned Civil Judge No. 2, Kamrup(M) at Guwahati, in Title Appeal No. 52/2016. 3. It is to be noted here that vide impugned judgment and decree, dated 01...
GUWAHATI, India, July 23 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on June 24: 1. Heard Mr. D. Goswami, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Mr. A. Ikbal, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. This is an appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short 'the Code') challenging the judgment and decree dated 15.07.2024 passed by the learned Court of the Civil Judge, (Senior Division) Kamrup, Amingaon in Title A...