RANCHI, India, July 26 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 26: 1 Instant writ petition has been filed for direction to the Circle Officer, Chandil, Chandil Anchal (respondent no.3) for demarcation of the petitioner's land situated in Khata No.159, Plot Nos.222, 224, 225 & 226, having an area of 3.78 acres and Khata No.160, Plot Nos.227, 228, 223, & 229, measuring an area 2.13 acres. 2. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has submitted an applicat...
RANCHI, India, July 26 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 26: 1. The petitioner is a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. 2. The 3rd respondent is the Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, the 2nd respondent is the Examination Controller of the said Commission and the 4th respondent is Deputy Secretary of the said Commission. The background facts 3. The 3rd respondent issued a tender on 16.11.2021 inviting Expression of Interest for s...
RANCHI, India, July 26 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 26: All these writ petitions have been preferred against the orders passed by the Additional Collector-cum-Arbitrator, Bokaro in Land Acquisition Appeal Nos. 08/2016-17, 11/2016-17, 14/2016-17, 06/2016-17, 07/2016-17, 09/2016- 17 and 12/2016-17, whereby and whereunder, the appeals were allowed for enhancement of compensation. Aggrieved by the awards, the instant writ petitions have been filed. A preliminary obj...
RANCHI, India, July 26 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 26: All these writ petitions have been preferred against the orders passed by the Additional Collector-cum-Arbitrator, Bokaro in Land Acquisition Appeal Nos. 08/2016-17, 11/2016-17, 14/2016-17, 06/2016-17, 07/2016-17, 09/2016- 17 and 12/2016-17, whereby and whereunder, the appeals were allowed for enhancement of compensation. Aggrieved by the awards, the instant writ petitions have been filed. A preliminary obj...
RANCHI, India, July 26 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 26: 1. This Second Appeal shall be heard on the following substantial question of law: " (1) Whether the learned first appellate court has misconstrued Exhibit No.1 i.e. the Khatiyan of Jamabandi No.1 and the Exhibit-G that is the registered partition deed dated 09.02.1979 and in view of that the finding of the learned first appellate court is not sustainable in the eye of law, or not?" 2. Issue notice upon the ...
RANCHI, India, July 26 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 26: 1. This Second Appeal shall be heard on following substantial question of law: "(A) Whether the learned appellate court has committed a blatant error to held that u/s 14(8) of Jharkhand Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 2000, a revision will lie against the trial court order despite of the fact that other issues including defaulters (default for rent) u/s 11(d) of Jharkhand Building (Lease, Rent...
RANCHI, India, July 26 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 26: 1. The instant appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent is directed against the order dated 28.11.2019 passed in W.P(S) No.181 of 2016 whereby and whereunder the writ petition has been allowed by the learned Single Judge whereby and whereunder the impugned order dated 13.05.2015 contained in Memo No.4280 (Annexure-25 to the writ petition) and Resolution dated 20.12.2012 contained in Memo No.13920 (Annexure...
RANCHI, India, July 26 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 26: 1. In M.A. No.164 of 2024, Mr. Bhaskar Trivedi, the learned counsel has appeared on behalf of the respondent nos.3 and 4. 2. Notice upon the respondent no.5 has been refused by the family to accept. Thus, notice upon respondent no.5 is deemed to be validly served. 3. Notice upon respondent nos.1,2 and 6 are not effected. 4. Learned counsel for the appellants will take fresh steps for notice upon the resp...
RANCHI, India, July 26 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 26: 1. In M.A. No.164 of 2024, Mr. Bhaskar Trivedi, the learned counsel has appeared on behalf of the respondent nos.3 and 4. 2. Notice upon the respondent no.5 has been refused by the family to accept. Thus, notice upon respondent no.5 is deemed to be validly served. 3. Notice upon respondent nos.1,2 and 6 are not effected. 4. Learned counsel for the appellants will take fresh steps for notice upon the resp...
GUWAHATI, India, July 26 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on June 25: 1. Heard Ms. R. Choudhury, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. Mr. N. Choudhury, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 to 7 and Mr. A.F.N.U. Mollah, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent No. 8. 2. The supervisory jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked challenging the order dated 13.03.2020 passed by the learned Court of the Civil Judge, ...