RANCHI, India, July 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 30: 1) In these Writ Petitions, petitioners challenge clause (4) of Rule 8 and also sub clause (iii) of Clause (A) of the said Rule 8 of the Jharkhand Range Forest Officers Service (Recruitment, Promotion and other Conditions of Service) Rules,2024. 2) These rules have been framed by the State of Jharkhand after repealing the previous rules framed in the year 2018. 3) The principal contention of the petitioner...
RANCHI, India, July 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 30: 1) In these Writ Petitions, petitioners challenge clause (4) of Rule 8 and also sub clause (iii) of Clause (A) of the said Rule 8 of the Jharkhand Range Forest Officers Service (Recruitment, Promotion and other Conditions of Service) Rules,2024. 2) These rules have been framed by the State of Jharkhand after repealing the previous rules framed in the year 2018. 3) The principal contention of the petitioner...
RANCHI, India, July 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 30: Since the petitioners have assailed a Clause in an Advertisement No.04/2020 flowing from Rule 4.2 of the Jharkhand Town Planning Service (Recruitment, Promotion and other Conditions) Rules, 2014, and since the appointments have already been made pursuant to the said advertisement, and since the petitioners' prayer in the writ petition filed five years after the said advertisement is issued jeopardizes the pers...
JABALPUR, India, July 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on June 27: IA No.5190 of 2025 This is an application for condonation of delay of 272 days in filing the present MCC. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the MCC is condoned and IA stands allowed. MCC No.915 of 2025 Petitioner seeks restoration of WP No.10083 of 2022, which was dismissed for non-compliance of common order dated 09.05.2024. In view of the averments made in the p...
JABALPUR, India, July 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on June 27: 1. This is an application for condonation of delay of one day in filing the appeal. 2. It is contended that appellants were not made parties to the writ petition and as such were unaware of passing of impugned order. 3. We are satisfied that appellants have duly explained the reason for not approaching the Court within the period of limitation. In view of the fact that appellants were unawa...
JABALPUR, India, July 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on June 27: Petitioners impugn order dated 24.02.2025, whereby the petition filed by the petitioners has been dismissed on the ground that the petitioners are not Sarhadi Krishak to the owner of the land contained in Survey No.814 and accordingly, no notice was required to be issued to them. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the copy of traced map to Annexure P/1 showed that petitioners were th...
JABALPUR, India, July 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on June 27: 1. Appellant impugns order dated 06.05.2025 whereby the learned Single Judge had issued notice to the respondents. 2. Learned senior counsel for the appellant submits that the learned writ court erred in not appreciating that the case of the appellant was squarely covered by the judgments of Coordinate Benches of the Court and could have been disposed of without a long drawn litigation. He fu...
JABALPUR, India, July 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on June 27: 1. Appellant impugns order dated 06.05.2025, whereby the writ petition of the appellant has been disposed of relying on an order passed in a connected Writ Petition being W.P. No.2948/2025. The connected Writ Petition No.2948/2025 was filed by One Shri Ashwin Richhariya. 2. Learned senior counsel appearing for Ashwin Richhariya seeks leave to intervene. On the oral prayer of the appellant, As...
JABALPUR, India, July 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on June 27: 1. After some arguments, learned senior counsel for appellant under instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the appeal however prays that the respondents be directed to consider the representation dated 09.06.2025 (Annexure P/9 in writ petition) in accordance with law. He further prays that appellant be permitted to furnish a supplementary representation, which the appellant shall furnish within ...
JABALPUR, India, July 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on June 27: After some arguments, learned counsel for appellant seeks leave to withdraw the appeal reserving the right of the appellant to impugn the order dated 25.01.2024 before appropriate forum in accordance with law. Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....