NAINITAL, India, May 11 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner-firm has assailed the order dated 16.08.2024 passed under Section 73 of the CGST/ UKGST Act, 2017, in respect of Financial Year 2019-20. The sole submission of learned counsel for the petitioner-firm is that, in the show-cause notice issued to the petitioner-firm dated 20.05.2024, no date of personal hearing was fixed, although it is a m...
IMPHAL, India, May 11 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on April 9: Mr. Khagemba, learned counsel representing counsel on record for private parties and Mr. Phungyo Zingkhai, learned State counsel representing official parties are before this Court (Physical Court). Both learned counsel request for an adjournment citing difficulty for their respective arguing counsel. Afore-referred common/joint request is acceded to. List under the same cause list caption 'HEARING'. List on 2...
NAINITAL, India, May 11 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. The present writ petition has been filed praying for quashing of the tender notice dated 28.01.2026 to the extent it relates to godown No.ICF B-5026 and for a further direction to the respondents to regularize the lease of the petitioner in respect of the said godown. 2. The petitioner claimed that he was occupying the godown on basis of lease agreement dated 30.08.2006 in his favour and the l...
IMPHAL, India, May 11 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on April 9: [1] Mr. Ch. Momon, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter may be taken up on some other day. [2] Ms. I. Sharmila, learned Jr. GA for the State respondents has no objection. [3] List this case on 03.06.2026. [4] Interim order, if any, is extended till the next date. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
IMPHAL, India, May 11 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on April 9: [1] Present Mr. Sarvan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter may be listed on 21.04.2026. [2] Mr. S. Nepolean, learned Sr. counsel & GA appearing along with Mr. A. Vashum, learned GA for the State respondents has no objection. [3] Accordingly, list this case on 21.04.2026. [4] Interim order, if any, is extended till the next date. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
IMPHAL, India, May 11 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on April 9: Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner and submitted that he is ready to advance argument. Ms. W. Geetarani, learned counsel appeared on behalf of the respondent No. 1 representing the Advocate on record and seeks adjournment of hearing of these cases in the next week citing personal difficulty on the part of the conducting counsel. This prayer is not objected to by the learned c...
IMPHAL, India, May 11 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on April 9: [1] Mr. Ch. Momon representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter may be taken up on some other day. [2] Mr. A. Vashum, learned GA for the State respondents has no objection. [3] List this case on 18.05.2026. [4] Interim order, if any, is extended till the next date. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
IMPHAL, India, May 11 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on April 9: Mr. Ch. Momon, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the matter may be taken up on some other day. Mr. S. Suresh, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 and Mr. Th. Sukumar, learned Government Advocate for the State respondents, have no objection. List this case on 12-05-2026. Interim order, if any, is extended till the next date. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
IMPHAL, India, May 11 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on April 9: Mr. Th. Khagemba, learned counsel representing the learned counsel on record for revision petitioner is before this Court (physical Court). Ms. G. Pushpa, learned counsel representing the learned counsel on record for respondent is before this Court on the Video Conferencing (V.C.) platform. Both learned counsel request for rescheduling of the captioned matter citing difficulty/inconvenience for the counsel on r...
NAINITAL, India, May 11 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. Instant appeal is preferred against award dated 16.12.2022, passed in Motor Accident Claim Petition No.19 of 2019, Nahid Vs. Shri Subhash Chawla and others, by the court of Motor Accident Claim Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal, by which, the appellant has been directed to pay compensation of Rs.28,26,645/- along with interest to the respondent no.1/Nahid ("the ...