NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. The appeal from order No.505 of 2011 has been preferred by the State of Uttarakhand under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, assailing the judgment and award dated 27.10.2010 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 102 of 2006 Umesh Chandra Pandey Vs. U.P. Seeds and Tarai Vikas Nigam and Ors.,...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. This appeal arises out of the judgment and award dated 21.04.2012 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, whereby compensation to the tune of Rs.18,18,872/- along with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of claim petition till actual payment was made, was awarded in favour of the claimants on account of the death of Rajkumar, who succumbed to injuries sustained in a motor veh...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. The appeal from order No.505 of 2011 has been preferred by the State of Uttarakhand under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, assailing the judgment and award dated 27.10.2010 passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar, in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 102 of 2006 Umesh Chandra Pandey Vs. U.P. Seeds and Tarai Vikas Nigam and Ors.,...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. Since the FIR from which these appeals arose is one and the same and the offence alleged against them is also similar, hence both these appeals are taken up together and decided by this common judgment. 2. CRLA No.284/2025 is directed against the judgment and order dated 20.03.2025, passed by learned Special Judge (UAP Act)/Second Additional Sessions Judge, Haldwani, District Nainital in FIR...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. Since the FIR from which these appeals arose is one and the same and the offence alleged against them is also similar, hence both these appeals are taken up together and decided by this common judgment. 2. CRLA No.284/2025 is directed against the judgment and order dated 20.03.2025, passed by learned Special Judge (UAP Act)/Second Additional Sessions Judge, Haldwani, District Nainital in FIR...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. Mrs. Neelima Mishra, learned legal aid counsel for the Appellant. 2. Mr. J.P. Kandpal, learned Brief Holder, for the State of Uttarakhand. 3. The present matter is listed today for final hearing. 4. Appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under Sections 376, 363 and 366-A of IPC, and under Sections 3/4 of the POCSO Act, vide judgment and order dated 28.11.2017, passed by the cou...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. Applicant - Vishal Bisht is in judicial custody for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 115(2), 191(3), 3(5), 324(4), 324(5), 351(2), 351(3) and Section 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in Case Crime No. 201 of 2025, registered at Police Station Haldwani, District Nainital. 2. According to the respondent-State, on 23.06.2025 at about 07.30 p.m., Harish Singh Mehra, the younger...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. Applicant - Smt. Renu is in judicial custody for the offence punishable under Section 103(1) read with Section 3(5), Section 61(2) and Section 238 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in Case Crime No.575 of 2024, registered at Police Station Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar. 2. As per the respondent-State, Sumit, aged about 24 years, the husband of the informant Smt. Renu (applicant), w...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. Mr. Tejas Agarrwal, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. Vikas Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. Present bail applications are moved by the applicant-Ajay, who is in judicial custody in connection with Case Crime/FIR No.10 of 2026, Case Crime/FIR No.09 of 2026 and Case Crime/FIR No.08 of 2026 under Sections 303...
NAINITAL, India, March 26 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on Feb. 25: 1. Applicant-Vikas Pal alias Murga is in judicial custody for the offence punishable under Section 109(1) read with Section 3 (5), Section 309 (4) and Section 317(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in Case Crime No.49 of 2025, registered at Police Station Sitarganj, District Udham Singh Nagar. 2. According to the First Information Report, on 01.02.2025, Smt. Anju, sister-in-law (Bhabhi) of...