NAINITAL, India, May 11 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The main prayer made in the writ petition is for issuing appropriate direction to the respondentdevelopment authority to execute the demolition order dated 23.08.2024 (Annexure No.1) passed against respondent no.4. 3. In the compliance affidavit filed by respondent no.2 the stand taken is that an appeal is pending against the sealing order dated 12.0...
NAINITAL, India, May 11 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. The petitioner has assailed the order dated 01.04.2022 cancelling the GST registration of the petitioner-firm on the ground that it has failed to file the returns within the prescribed period. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in identical facts and circumstances in WPMB No. 39 of 2025, a Coordinate Bench has permitted the petitioner therein to file an application for revocati...
SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. The writ petitioner a registered Class-I Government contractor under the Public Works Department being aggrieved with the action of the respondent No. 5, in commencing the execution of a public road construction work for the "Improvement of the existing road including MBT of New Nongstoin to Nongstoin Village" including different link roads within Nongstoin in the month of October, 2024, without a...
NAINITAL, India, May 11 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. The petition suffers from multifariousness and misjoinder of causes of action. It is dismissed with liberty to file afresh. 2. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. This is an application filed by the applicant for impleading Shri. Sujin R.Sangma, Rev. Jack N. Sangma, Smti. Silme Ch. Marak and Shri. Teofield T. Sangma, as party respondents in the pending WP(C). No. 664 of 2025. 2. As the same is as per direction of this Court, the application is allowed and the persons named hereinabove shall be impleaded as respondents No. 4, 5, 6 & 7. 3. Registry to mak...
SHILLONG, India, May 11 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: In view of the order passed in WP(C) No. 166 of 2025, this Misc. Case also stands disposed of. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
NAINITAL, India, May 11 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. Ms. Aananya Jain, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel for the respondents. Withdrawal Application (IA No.02 of 2026) 3. The petitioner has filed the instant application for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to avail the remedy of statutory appeal. The application is supported by an affidavit of Mr. Saurabh Vinayak, Director of the petition...
NAINITAL, India, May 11 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. Mr. Prabhat Bohra, learned counsel for the petitioner through video conferencing. 2. Ms. Mansi Chauhan, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 to 4. Withdrawal Application (IA No.01 of 2026) 3. The petitioner has filed the instant application for withdrawal of the writ petition. The application is supported by an affidavit of the authorized ...
NAINITAL, India, May 11 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 9: 1. Mr. Prabhat Bohra, learned counsel for the petitioner through video conferencing. 2. Ms. Mansi Chauhan, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 to 4. Withdrawal Application (IA No.02 of 2026) 3. The petitioner has filed the instant application for withdrawal of the writ petition. The application is supported by an affidavit of the authorized si...
IMPHAL, India, May 11 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on April 9: Mr. Th. Khagemba, learned counsel representing the learned counsel on record for revision petitioner is before this Court (physical Court) and Ms. G. Pushpa, learned counsel representing the learned counsel on record for respondents is before this Court on the Video Conferencing (V.C.) platform. Both learned counsel request for rescheduling of the captioned matter citing difficulty/inconvenience for the counsel ...