JABALPUR, India, July 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on June 30: 1. Appellant impugns order dated 19.03.2025, whereby the writ petition filed by the appellant/petitioner challenging an order dated 05.05.2022 passed by the M.P. State Cooperative Tribunal, Bhopal, has been dismissed. 2. Appellant was employed on the post of Peon/Process Server as a daily rated worker in the respondent/Bank along with two other individuals. Initially, appellant was appointed ...
JABALPUR, India, July 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on June 30: Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for respondents No. 1 to 4 as also by counsel for respondent No.4. With the consent of the parties, the appeal is taken up for final hearing. Petitioner impugns order dated 19.02.2025 whereby the writ petition of the petitioner has been dismissed on the ground that petitioner has neither filed the bylaws of the association nor a ...
JABALPUR, India, July 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on June 30: Since the caveater has appeared. Caveat is discharged. Petitioner impugns the communication dated 09.05.2025 whereby the respondents have directed the authority to invoke the bank guarantee and also recover the balance amount from the petitioner, if any. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire recovery has already been made by the respondents even before the appellant cou...
JABALPUR, India, July 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on June 30: 1. Corpus, a minor, has been produced by Shri Rajesh Sharma, Head Constable No.796 and Ms. Rambati, Head Constable No.272 of Thana Cantt., Jabalpur. 2. It is contended on behalf of the State that she had gone with respondent No.5 against whom FIR has already been registered under Sections 64 and 65 of B.N.S. and Section 5 of the POCSO Act. He is in custody and appropriate proceedings are unde...
JABALPUR, India, July 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on June 30: Learned counsel for petitioner submits that since the examination date is already over he seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Petition, is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, July 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on June 30: Learned counsel for respondent submits that bills of the petitioner are disputed. The dispute emanates out of a works contract. Accordingly, the writ petition before this Court would not be maintainable. Petitioner would have to approach the arbitral Tribunal under the provisions of the Madhya Pradesh Madhyastham Adhikaran Adhiniyam, 1983. In view thereof, the petition is dismissed reservin...
JABALPUR, India, July 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on June 30: Learned counsel for petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Petition, is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, July 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on June 27: Learned counsel for respondent who appears on advance notice raises an preliminary objection with regard to maintainability of petition. He submits that petition has been filed in the name of general public and no identifiable section has been mentioned. Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndic...
JABALPUR, India, July 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on June 27: Learned counsel for petitioner submits that there is a technical defect in the petition accordingly, petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh comprehensive petition in accordance with law. In view of the above, petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, July 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on June 27: 1. In all these writ petitions, a common question of fact and law is involved and therefore, they are heard analogously and disposed of by this common order. 2. A common grievance of the petitioners in this batch of writ petitions is with regard to grant of annual increment which became due on completion of one year's service before attaining the age of superannuation. In some of the cases, t...