JABALPUR, India, Dec. 8 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Nov. 7: IA No.19164 of 2025 This is an application for condonation of delay of 142 days in filing the present MCC. For the reasons stated in the application, delay in filing the MCC is condoned and IA stands allowed. MCC No.3320 of 2025 Petitioner seeks restoration of W.P.No.18255 of 2023, which was dismissed for non-compliance of common conditional order dated 18.12.2024. The counsel for petitione...
JABALPUR, India, Dec. 8 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Nov. 7: Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 30.10.2025, whereby the interim prayer of the petitioner seeking stay on the transfer has been declined holding that the petitioner can come back to defend himself in the criminal case and the respondents have agreed to grant leave as per availability. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has been implicated in a false case while he wa...
JABALPUR, India, Dec. 8 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Nov. 7: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition reserving the right of the petitioner to initiated legal proceeding in accordance with law. Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Dec. 8 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Nov. 7: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the counsel has just got to learn that DRT has commenced hearing of urgent mentioned matters. Accordingly, he seeks leave to withdraw the petition reserving the right of the petitioner to approach the DRT for an urgent consideration of the interim prayer in the original Securitization Application filed by petitioner. In view of above, petition is d...
JABALPUR, India, Dec. 8 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Nov. 7: 1. Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 15.07.2024, passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal to the limited extent that the order restricts the arrears to three years prior to issuance of the order. 2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the original petition was filed in the year 2019 and the order restricting the period of three years from the date of order is erroneous an...
JABALPUR, India, Dec. 8 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Nov. 7: Learned counsel for petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition, reserving the right of the petitioners to file appropriate objections under Section 3C of the National Highways Act, 1956. Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, Dec. 8 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Nov. 7: Heard Ms. S. B. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. T. C. Chutia, learned Addl. Senior Government Advocate, Assam appearing for the State respondents and Ms. M. D. Borah, learned Standing Counsel, Transport Department, Assam. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner is seeking a direction for appointment on compassionate ground. Issue notic...
GUWAHATI, India, Dec. 8 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Nov. 7: It is submitted that the conducting counsel MD A. Islam, learned counsel for the petitioner is out of station and therefore, prays for some accommodation today. Accordingly, list this matter again after 1(one) week on a date to be fixed by the Registry. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, Dec. 8 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Nov. 7: Heard Mr. DK Sarmah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Deka, learned CGC for the respondent no.1 ad Mr. A Ganguly, learned Standing Counsel, Assam Gramin Vikash Bank, for the respondent nos. 4 & 5. Office note dated 03.11.2025 reflects that in terms of the order dated 07.04.2025 names of the respondent nos. 2 & 3 are struck off from the array of the respondents. But, the necessary endorsement...
GUWAHATI, India, Dec. 8 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Nov. 7: 1. Heard Mr H R Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr A Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1 and Mr H Sarma, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the other respondents. 2. Although the respondents are yet to file their affidavit-in-opposition in the matter, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that while the prayers in ...