AMARAVATI, India, May 24 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on April 23: 1. Heard, Sri M.Venkata Sai Nikhil Kashyap, learned Counsel for Petitioners and Sri K.Ramalingeswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Respondents No.1 and 2 in both the contempt cases 2. Both the Counsel for the Petitioners as well as Respondents submitted that the Orders have been complied with and to that effect proceedings, dated 13.04.2026 have been issued. Recorded said submission. 3. In that...
AMARAVATI, India, May 24 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on April 23: 1. None appeared on 20.04.2026, even after the matter was called out twice by this Court. Today, this Contempt Case is listed under the caption "For Dismissal." Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the Contempt Petitioner. 2. Having so recorded, the Contempt Case is dismissed for Nonprosecution. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of thi...
AMARAVATI, India, May 24 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on April 23: 1. Heard, Sri M.Venkata Sai Nikhil Kashyap, learned Counsel for Petitioners and Sri K.Ramalingeswara Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Respondents No.1 and 2 in both the contempt cases 2. Both the Counsel for the Petitioners as well as Respondents submitted that the Orders have been complied with and to that effect proceedings, dated 13.04.2026 have been issued. Recorded said submission. 3. In that...
AMARAVATI, India, May 24 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on April 23: 1. The present Contempt Case is filed for non-implementation of the Order of this Court dated 26.09.2022 passed in Writ Petition No.31361 of 2022 wherein this Court directed the respondents to conduct survey as per Section 10(1) of the Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 and pass appropriate orders. 2. After notice, respondents have filed counter affidavit, wherein they have stated that on...
AMARAVATI, India, May 24 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on April 23: 1. The present Contempt Case is filed for non-implementation of the Order of this Court dated 12.09.2022 in WP No.28150 of 2022. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order of this Court dated 12.09.2022 in WP No.28150 of 2022 has been complied with and as such, the Contempt Case may be closed. 3. Recording the submission made by lea...
AMARAVATI, India, May 24 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on April 23: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 16.03.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.6395 of 2023. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 16.03.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.6395 of 2023, and hence, no further orders are required to be passe...
AMARAVATI, India, May 24 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on April 23: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 10.05.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.12556 of 2023. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 10.05.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.12556 of 2023, and hence, no further orders are required to be pass...
AMARAVATI, India, May 24 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on April 23: 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.22372 of 2025, dated 28.08.2025 has been complied with and as such no further orders are necessary in this Contempt Case. 2. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. The issue involved in these petitions is identical, therefore, they are heard analogously and decided by this common order. For the sake of convenience, fact are taken from W.P.No.11973/2014. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking following reliefs : 1. To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the Notification dated 11.01.2008 which...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. The issue involved in these petitions is identical, therefore, they are heard analogously and decided by this common order. For the sake of convenience, fact are taken from W.P.No.11973/2014. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking following reliefs : 1. To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the Notification dated 11.01.2008 which...