JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. The issue involved in these petitions is identical, therefore, they are heard analogously and decided by this common order. For the sake of convenience, fact are taken from W.P.No.11973/2014. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking following reliefs : 1. To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the Notification dated 11.01.2008 which...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. This criminal appeal under Section 378(III) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the appellant/State being aggrieved by the judgment dated 29.05.2014 passed by the learned Second Upper Sessions Judge, Katni, District Katni, in ST No.125/2010, whereby the respondent (hereinafter referred to as the 'accused persons') have been acquitted from the charges under Sections 306 and 29...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. This petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 (corresponding to Section 482 of CrPC, 1973) has been filed by the applicant, being aggrieved by the order dated 23.01.2026 passed in Criminal Revision No.869/2025 by learned XIX th Additional Sessions Judge, Bhopal, District Bhopal (M.P.), affirming the order dated 12.12.2025 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhopal (M.P.), in connection with C...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking the following reliefs:- "7.1- Issue a Writ, order or direction in nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and call the entire records of the effected village Kudri in which the respondents had done illegal depillaring work and damaged the agriculture land of petitioners. 7.2- To direct the respondents t...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. These appeals are filed on behalf of the convicted appellants, viz., Santosh Ahirwar S/o Santu Ahirwar, Sohil @ Bhuru @Amit S/o Hidayat Khan, Monu Uike (Thakur) S/o Dhunu Uike (Thakur), Mohan Patel S/o Tarapad Patel, Madhu Yadav S/o Prahlad Yadav, Manish Yadav S/o Thamman Singh Yadav, Rajkumar Patel S/o Ravishankar Patel, Nitesh @ Jattu Vanshkar S/o Prakash Vanshkar, Kalyan Patel S/o Komal Singh P...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. These appeals are filed on behalf of the convicted appellants, viz., Santosh Ahirwar S/o Santu Ahirwar, Sohil @ Bhuru @Amit S/o Hidayat Khan, Monu Uike (Thakur) S/o Dhunu Uike (Thakur), Mohan Patel S/o Tarapad Patel, Madhu Yadav S/o Prahlad Yadav, Manish Yadav S/o Thamman Singh Yadav, Rajkumar Patel S/o Ravishankar Patel, Nitesh @ Jattu Vanshkar S/o Prakash Vanshkar, Kalyan Patel S/o Komal Singh P...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. The issue involved in these petitions is identical, therefore, they are heard analogously and decided by this common order. For the sake of convenience, fact are taken from W.P.No.11973/2014. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking following reliefs : 1. To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the Notification dated 11.01.2008 which...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. Heard on I.A. No.25481 of 2022, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay. On due consideration, the aforesaid application is allowed. The delay of 109 days occurred in filing this appeal is hereby condoned. This appeal under Section 378(III) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the appellant/State assailing the judgment and order of acqui...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. These appeals are filed on behalf of the convicted appellants, viz., Santosh Ahirwar S/o Santu Ahirwar, Sohil @ Bhuru @ Amit S/o Hidayat Khan, Monu Uike (Thakur) S/o Dhunu Uike (Thakur), Mohan Patel S/o Tarapad Patel, Madhu Yadav S/o Prahlad Yadav, Manish Yadav S/o Thamman Singh Yadav, Rajkumar Patel S/o Ravishankar Patel, Nitesh @ Jattu Vanshkar S/o Prakash Vanshkar, Kalyan Patel S/o Komal Singh ...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. These appeals are filed on behalf of the convicted appellants, viz., Santosh Ahirwar S/o Santu Ahirwar, Sohil @ Bhuru @ Amit S/o Hidayat Khan, Monu Uike (Thakur) S/o Dhunu Uike (Thakur), Mohan Patel S/o Tarapad Patel, Madhu Yadav S/o Prahlad Yadav, Manish Yadav S/o Thamman Singh Yadav, Rajkumar Patel S/o Ravishankar Patel, Nitesh @ Jattu Vanshkar S/o Prakash Vanshkar, Kalyan Patel S/o Komal Singh ...