India, April 1 -- Pune, Maharashtra: In a city as dynamic and fast-evolving as Pune, real estate is not merely about constructing buildings; it is about shaping communities that endure. Siddhashila has steadily emerged as a name associated with thoughtful development, refined design, and a deep understanding of urban living. At the heart of this growth lies a leadership vision anchored in long-term value creation, architectural integrity, and a commitment to enhancing everyday life for residents...
GANGTOK, India, April 1 -- Sikkim High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 2: This arbitration petition is listed for hearing today. The parties could not reach a consensus with regard to the appointment of a Sole Arbitrator. Though, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submitted a list of Arbitrators, the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the State could not accede to the proposal. The subject matter of the contract falls within the State of Sikkim. The venue is a...
GANGTOK, India, April 1 -- Sikkim High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 2: 1. There is nothing in criminal law which prohibits accepting a minor victim's statement. Rule is of caution. Caution against tutoring which some children may be susceptible to. In sexual offences one rarely finds evidence of eye witnesses. Statement of minor victim has to be cautiously examined by the Court. Corroboration of a minor victim's statement is not a rule. The Court however, examines the surr...
GANGTOK, India, April 1 -- Sikkim High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 2: 1. Heard Learned Counsel for the parties. 2. The Court of the Principal District Judge, Gangtok, Sikkim, in Title Suit No.05 of 2025 (The Karmapa Charitable Trust vs. The State of Sikkim, through the Chief Secretary and Others), vide the impugned Order, dated 28-05-2025, inter alia recorded that; ".................................................................................... Contrary to the su...
GANGTOK, India, April 1 -- Sikkim High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 2: In view of the conclusion of the Division Bench of this Court, in Writ Appeals No.02 and 03 of 2026, the Contempt Petition being infructuous stands disposed of accordingly. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GANGTOK, India, April 1 -- Sikkim High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 2: Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that they seek to withdraw the instant matter. Learned Counsel for the Respondents No.2 and 3 submits that since the time of the Counsel and this Court has been wasted, heavy costs be imposed on the Petitioner. Having heard Learned Counsel for the parties, I am not inclined to impose costs on the Petitioner. The prayer of the Petitioner is allowed and the ...
GANGTOK, India, April 1 -- Sikkim High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 2: On the last date, vide Order dated 19-03-2026, the Counsel for the Appellant had submitted that the matter was settled between the contesting parties before the Learned Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, in MACT Execution Case No.13 of 2025 (Sarita Gupta vs. The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Limited, Gangtok and Another). The Learned Counsel for the Appellant had sought time to file necessary...
GANGTOK, India, April 1 -- Sikkim High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 2: 1. Heard W.A. No.02 of 2026 and W.A. No.03 of 2026. 2. Both matters came up for admission. We propose to dispose of both these matters together. 3. The Respondents have also entered appearance. 4. We have the advantage of hearing learned Counsel for the Appellant as well as learned Counsel for the Respondents. 5. These matters arise in these appeals from two separate writ petitions filed by land...
GANGTOK, India, April 1 -- Sikkim High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 2: 1. Heard W.A. No.02 of 2026 and W.A. No.03 of 2026. 2. Both matters came up for admission. We propose to dispose of both these matters together. 3. The Respondents have also entered appearance. 4. We have the advantage of hearing learned Counsel for the Appellant as well as learned Counsel for the Respondents. 5. These matters arise in these appeals from two separate writ petitions filed by land...
CUTTACK, India, April 1 -- Orissa High Court issued the following order on Jan. 13 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No. 2864 of 2022 Ganesh Sabar .... Petitioner Represented by Mr. S.K. Pradhan, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha .... Opp. Party CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER 13.01.2026 This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. By order dated 23.09.2022, this Court granted bail to the petitioner imposing certain conditions. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairl...