GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B. Talukdar, learned standing counsel for the respondents in Elementary Education Department and Ms. B. Bora, learned standing counsel for respondents in Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC), in WP(C) Nos. 7226/2019, 1413/2024, 1428/2024, 1449/2024 and 1462/2024. 2. In all these five petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...
GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B. Talukdar, learned standing counsel for the respondents in Elementary Education Department and Ms. B. Bora, learned standing counsel for respondents in Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC), in WP(C) Nos. 7226/2019, 1413/2024, 1428/2024, 1449/2024 and 1462/2024. 2. In all these five petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...
GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard Mr. S. Banik, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mrs. R. Devi, the learned CGC, who appears on behalf of the respondents. 2. The present writ proceeding is filed challenging the opinion rendered in the Review Medical Examination Report of the P.O. RME Board No. 5, RTC SSB Salonibari wherein it was opined that the petitioner is unfit. 3. The materials on record show that ...
GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard Mr. A. M. Khan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. S. S. Roy, the learned CGC, who appears on behalf of the respondents. 2. The present writ proceeding is filed challenging the opinion rendered in the Review Medical Examination Report of the Addl. RME Board, CT/GD-2025, GC CRPF, Guwahati wherein it was opined that the petitioner is unfit. 3. The materials on record s...
GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard Mr. D. Borah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Ms. A. Gayan, the learned CGC, who appears on behalf of the respondents. 2. The present writ proceeding is filed challenging the opinion rendered in the Review Medical Examination Report of the Addl. RME, RTC SSB Salonibari wherein it was opined that the petitioner is unfit. 3. The materials on record show that in pursuanc...
GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard Mr. H.R.A. Choudhury, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. A.H.M.R. Choudhury, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. D. Nath, the learned Senior Government Advocate appears on behalf of the respondent No. 2 and Mr. P. Nayak, the learned Additional Advocate General appears on behalf of the respondent No. 1. Mr. A. Garg, District Commissioner, Cachar, Silchar is also prese...
AMARAVATI, India, March 2 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the order dated 18.07.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.15502 of 2025. 2. Heard Sri Venkat Sailendra.G, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for respondent/contemnor. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the respondents that the order under conte...
AMARAVATI, India, March 2 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. The contempt case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for willful violation of the order of this Court dated 10.02.2025 passed in W.P.No.16716 of 2024. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order had been complied with and no order is required in this contempt case and requested to close the petition. 3. Hence, th...
AMARAVATI, India, March 2 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. This Contempt Case is filed against the respondents complaining willful disobedience of the order, dated 21.01.2003 passed by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.1363 of 2003 in W.P.No.1093 of 2003. 2. It appears that at the stage of admission, the Division Bench of this Court passed an interim order as extracted hereinunder:- "There shall be an interim direction to the respondents not to make any appointm...
AMARAVATI, India, March 2 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. This Contempt Case is filed against the respondent complaining willful disobedience of the order, dated 27.02.2007 passed by this Court in W.P.No.11934 of 2004, wherein the Division Bench of this Court while allowing the said writ petition holds that the market value, which has to be paid by the petitioners herein shall be Rs.1,71,064.80/- and the petitioners shall make deposit of the said amount wi...