GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B. Talukdar, learned standing counsel for the respondents in Elementary Education Department and Ms. B. Bora, learned standing counsel for respondents in Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC), in WP(C) Nos. 7226/2019, 1413/2024, 1428/2024, 1449/2024 and 1462/2024. 2. In all these five petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...
GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard Mr. P.K. Goswami, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. M. Das and Mr. A Das, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P. Nayak, learned Addl. Advocate General, Assam for the respondents. 2. The petitioners were appointed as Work Charged workers initially for a fixed period and subsequently they continued to render services till their superannuation without any break. They were appointed...
GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard Mr. R. A. Mazumder, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. R. Dhar, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 to 5. 2. The petitioner herein is aggrieved by the impugned Minutes dated 11.02.2022 and the extended sitting held on 16.03.2022 whereby the District Level Committee rejected the claim of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate ground. 3....
GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B. Talukdar, learned standing counsel for the respondents in Elementary Education Department and Ms. B. Bora, learned standing counsel for respondents in Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC), in WP(C) Nos. 7226/2019, 1413/2024, 1428/2024, 1449/2024 and 1462/2024. 2. In all these five petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...
GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B. Talukdar, learned standing counsel for the respondents in Elementary Education Department and Ms. B. Bora, learned standing counsel for respondents in Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC), in WP(C) Nos. 7226/2019, 1413/2024, 1428/2024, 1449/2024 and 1462/2024. 2. In all these five petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...
GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B. Talukdar, learned standing counsel for the respondents in Elementary Education Department and Ms. B. Bora, learned standing counsel for respondents in Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC), in WP(C) Nos. 7226/2019, 1413/2024, 1428/2024, 1449/2024 and 1462/2024. 2. In all these five petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...
GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard Mr. M. Sarma, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. B. Talukdar, learned standing counsel for the respondents in Elementary Education Department and Ms. B. Bora, learned standing counsel for respondents in Bodoland Territorial Council (BTC), in WP(C) Nos. 7226/2019, 1413/2024, 1428/2024, 1449/2024 and 1462/2024. 2. In all these five petitions, under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...
GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard Mr. S. Banik, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mrs. R. Devi, the learned CGC, who appears on behalf of the respondents. 2. The present writ proceeding is filed challenging the opinion rendered in the Review Medical Examination Report of the P.O. RME Board No. 5, RTC SSB Salonibari wherein it was opined that the petitioner is unfit. 3. The materials on record show that ...
GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard Mr. A. M. Khan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. S. S. Roy, the learned CGC, who appears on behalf of the respondents. 2. The present writ proceeding is filed challenging the opinion rendered in the Review Medical Examination Report of the Addl. RME Board, CT/GD-2025, GC CRPF, Guwahati wherein it was opined that the petitioner is unfit. 3. The materials on record s...
GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard Mr. D. Borah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Ms. A. Gayan, the learned CGC, who appears on behalf of the respondents. 2. The present writ proceeding is filed challenging the opinion rendered in the Review Medical Examination Report of the Addl. RME, RTC SSB Salonibari wherein it was opined that the petitioner is unfit. 3. The materials on record show that in pursuanc...