JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. These appeals are filed on behalf of the convicted appellants, viz., Santosh Ahirwar S/o Santu Ahirwar, Sohil @ Bhuru @Amit S/o Hidayat Khan, Monu Uike (Thakur) S/o Dhunu Uike (Thakur), Mohan Patel S/o Tarapad Patel, Madhu Yadav S/o Prahlad Yadav, Manish Yadav S/o Thamman Singh Yadav, Rajkumar Patel S/o Ravishankar Patel, Nitesh @ Jattu Vanshkar S/o Prakash Vanshkar, Kalyan Patel S/o Komal Singh P...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. These appeals are filed on behalf of the convicted appellants, viz., Santosh Ahirwar S/o Santu Ahirwar, Sohil @ Bhuru @Amit S/o Hidayat Khan, Monu Uike (Thakur) S/o Dhunu Uike (Thakur), Mohan Patel S/o Tarapad Patel, Madhu Yadav S/o Prahlad Yadav, Manish Yadav S/o Thamman Singh Yadav, Rajkumar Patel S/o Ravishankar Patel, Nitesh @ Jattu Vanshkar S/o Prakash Vanshkar, Kalyan Patel S/o Komal Singh P...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. The issue involved in these petitions is identical, therefore, they are heard analogously and decided by this common order. For the sake of convenience, fact are taken from W.P.No.11973/2014. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking following reliefs : 1. To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the Notification dated 11.01.2008 which...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. Heard on I.A. No.25481 of 2022, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay. On due consideration, the aforesaid application is allowed. The delay of 109 days occurred in filing this appeal is hereby condoned. This appeal under Section 378(III) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the appellant/State assailing the judgment and order of acqui...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. These appeals are filed on behalf of the convicted appellants, viz., Santosh Ahirwar S/o Santu Ahirwar, Sohil @ Bhuru @ Amit S/o Hidayat Khan, Monu Uike (Thakur) S/o Dhunu Uike (Thakur), Mohan Patel S/o Tarapad Patel, Madhu Yadav S/o Prahlad Yadav, Manish Yadav S/o Thamman Singh Yadav, Rajkumar Patel S/o Ravishankar Patel, Nitesh @ Jattu Vanshkar S/o Prakash Vanshkar, Kalyan Patel S/o Komal Singh ...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. These appeals are filed on behalf of the convicted appellants, viz., Santosh Ahirwar S/o Santu Ahirwar, Sohil @ Bhuru @ Amit S/o Hidayat Khan, Monu Uike (Thakur) S/o Dhunu Uike (Thakur), Mohan Patel S/o Tarapad Patel, Madhu Yadav S/o Prahlad Yadav, Manish Yadav S/o Thamman Singh Yadav, Rajkumar Patel S/o Ravishankar Patel, Nitesh @ Jattu Vanshkar S/o Prakash Vanshkar, Kalyan Patel S/o Komal Singh ...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 23: 1. These appeals are filed on behalf of the convicted appellants, viz., Santosh Ahirwar S/o Santu Ahirwar, Sohil @ Bhuru @ Amit S/o Hidayat Khan, Monu Uike (Thakur) S/o Dhunu Uike (Thakur), Mohan Patel S/o Tarapad Patel, Madhu Yadav S/o Prahlad Yadav, Manish Yadav S/o Thamman Singh Yadav, Rajkumar Patel S/o Ravishankar Patel, Nitesh @ Jattu Vanshkar S/o Prakash Vanshkar, Kalyan Patel S/o Komal Singh ...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 24: 1. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the invocation of the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court. The challenge is /01/2018, bearing Annexure P/1, passed by the respondents. By the said impugned order, the competent authority of the respondent Bank has arbitrarily declined the legitimate request of the petitioner for the ...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 24: 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following reliefs :- i) Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record of proceedings relating to passing of the impugned order(Annexure P/13) from the Office of respondent no.1. ii) Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or direction to quash the impugned order ...
JABALPUR, India, May 24 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment on April 24: 1. Petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging impugned order dated 20.09.2023 filed as Annexure P/1. 2. Impugned order is challenged on ground that de novo enquiry has been ordered and same cannot be done under Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966. 3. Counsel appearing for petitioner placed reliance on ju...