RANCHI, India, May 21 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 20: 1. Heard Mr. Sabyasanchi, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 03.01.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Sahibganj in M.C.A. No. 833 of 2025, arising out of Borio P.S. Case No. 03 of 2023, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. 3. It has been alleged that the daughter of the infor...
RANCHI, India, May 21 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 20: I.A. No. 5046 of 2026 1. Heard Ms. Pragati Prasad, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. 2. This application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning the delay of 16 days in filing of the instant appeal. 3. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the delay of 16 days in filing of this appeal is hereby condoned. 4. The a...
RANCHI, India, May 21 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 20: I.A. No. 4462 of 2026 1. Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. 2. This application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning the delay of 24 days in filing of the instant appeal. 3. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in the instant application, the same is allowed and the delay of 24 days in filing of this appeal is hereby condoned. 4. ...
RANCHI, India, May 21 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 20: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. This appeal challenges the Single Judge's order dated 24.02.2026 dismissing the appellant's W.P. (C) No. 3603 of 2023. 3. The learned counsel for the appellant argues that there was already an order for demarcation and the appellant merely desired such order to be enforced. He, therefore, submits that the learned Single Judge should not have relied upon the ...
RANCHI, India, May 21 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on April 20: 1. None is present to represent the appellant. 2. There was no appearance on behalf of the appellant on 12.03.2026 also. 3. Accordingly, the instant appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, May 21 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on April 20: 1. Heard Mr. A.M. Khan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner. Ms. R.R. Kakati, the learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the respondent IOCL. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner challenging the non-payment of the contractual bill amounting to Rs. 58,85,000/- for the work awarded to him pursuant to an online tender for the work namely, "ARC repair and mai...
GUWAHATI, India, May 21 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on April 20: 1. Heard Mr. K. Mohammed, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in WP(C) No.4965/2023 and Mr. D. Khan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in WP(C) No.5398/2023. Ms. U. Das, the learned Additional Senior Government Advocate appears on behalf of the State of Assam. 2. This Court had passed a detailed order on 09.12.2025 whereby the primary issue which was before this ...
GUWAHATI, India, May 21 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on April 20: 1. Heard Mr. K. Mohammed, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in WP(C) No.4965/2023 and Mr. D. Khan, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in WP(C) No.5398/2023. Ms. U. Das, the learned Additional Senior Government Advocate appears on behalf of the State of Assam. 2. This Court had passed a detailed order on 09.12.2025 whereby the primary issue which was before this ...
GUWAHATI, India, May 21 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on April 20: 1. Heard Mr. D. Baruah, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and Ms. G. Borah, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Agriculture Department. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the Petitioners challenging the non-payment of the contractual bill amounting to Rs. 4,00,000/- for the work awarded to the Petitioners pursuant to the NIT dated 03.12.2021 for Constr...
GUWAHATI, India, May 21 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on April 20: 1. Heard Mr. B. K. Gogoi, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr. P. Sarma, the learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent Nos. 1 to 6. I have also heard Ms. U. Das, the learned Additional Senior Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the Respondent No.7. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the non-payment of the contract...