RANCHI, India, March 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 3: 1. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. Petitioners have worked for more than ten years and thereafter, the order of regularization was passed on 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the earlier service which the petitioner has rendered to the respondents be calculated for the purpose of post retiral benefits. 4. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in ...
RANCHI, India, March 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 3: 1. Mr. Gaurav Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners appears through virtual mode. He has no complaint regarding the quality and clarity of audio and video. 2. Heard, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsels appearing on behalf of the JSSC. 3. The issue involved and sought to be raised in this writ p...
RANCHI, India, March 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 3: 1. Heard, learned counsel for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, petitioner has prayed for mandamus upon the respondent-State to immediately confirm the service of the petitioner and consequently to make payment of 1st, 2nd and 3rd ACP/MACP benefits especially taking into consideration that the petitioner has continuously served for more than 37 years without being promoted ever for a single occasion. 3...
RANCHI, India, March 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 3: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. At the request and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, we take this petition for final disposal. 3. This petition challenges the order dated 25th August, 2025, made by the Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate, Sahebganj, in Revenue Miscellaneous Case No.17 of 2024-25, raising a demand by way of penalty of Rs. 1,77,92,892.00 towards all...
RANCHI, India, March 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 3: 1. Learned counsel for the appellant is present. 2. This appeal has been filed against the order/judgment dated 10.02.2022 passed in Civil Appeal No. 90 of 2020 by learned District Judge-I, Dhanbad whereby the learned District Judge-I, Dhanbad has been pleased to set-aside the order dated 13.07.2018 passed by learned Civil Judge, Senior Division-VII, Dhanbad in Civil Misc. Case No. 18 of 2018. The executing c...
RANCHI, India, March 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 3: 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the order/judgment dated 17.05.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 4765 of 2018 whereby the writ petition filed by the writ petitioners (respondent nos. 1 to 5 herein) has been allowed by quashing and setting aside the condition mentioned in Clause 1.3 of the Statute dated 15.12.2022 and they have been held entitled for the monetary benefits fr...
RANCHI, India, March 4 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 3: 1. The present appeal has been preferred against the order/judgment dated 18.01.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 2686 of 2016 whereby the notification dated 23.08.2013 issued by the Deputy Secretary, Department of Road Construction, Government of Jharkhand has been quashed/set aside with an observation that the writ petitioner (the respondent herein) will be entitled to all consequential b...
GUWAHATI, India, March 4 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 4: 1. Heard Mr. D. Nandi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. M. Kumari, learned Standing Counsel for the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). 2. The instant criminal petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) has been filed by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.RC-0172023A0010 dated 02.08.2023, pertaining to CBI, ACB, Guwahati, filed under Section 120-B...
GUWAHATI, India, March 4 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 4: 1. Heard Mr. A.K. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Sarma, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State respondent No.1 and Mr. G. Choudhury, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2. 2. This is an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C praying for quashing of the impugned proceeding drawn under Section 500/34 of the Indian Penal Code, being Complain...
GUWAHATI, India, March 4 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Feb. 4: 1. Heard Ms. B.R.A. Sultana, learned Legal Aid Counsel for the appellant and Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Senior Counsel/Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam appearing for the State respondent. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 07.06.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (POCSO), Morigaon (hereinafter referred to as the "trial court") in POCSO Case No. 2...