RANCHI, India, Feb. 3 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 5: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, seeks leave of this Court not to press the instant writ petition with liberty to pursue his grievance before the authority concerned. 2. There is no opposition by learned counsel for the respondents-State. 3. Considering the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the liberty to ...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 3 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. Heard Mr. R. Goswami, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. Upadhyay, learned standing counsel, Irrigation Department, Assam appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 to 5 and Mr. S.M. Baruah, learned counsel representing respondent No. 7. 2. The petitioner by way of instituting the present writ petition has prayed for a direction upon the respondent authorities to promote her to the post of Senio...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 3 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 05TH JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2515 of 2025 Harendra alias Bittu Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate, with Mrs. Gyan Mati Kushwaha, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Tumul Nainwal, Assistant Government Advocate. Hon'ble Alok...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 3 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. Heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel representing the appellants. Also heard Mr. M. Ahmed and Mr. N.J. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. These batch of applications are under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act challenging the judgment and award dated 21.09.2020 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.1, Kamrup (M) in MAC Case Nos.156/2017 & 157/2017. 3. The claimants Uttam...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 3 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. Heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel representing the appellants. Also heard Mr. M. Ahmed and Mr. N.J. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. These batch of applications are under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act challenging the judgment and award dated 21.09.2020 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.1, Kamrup (M) in MAC Case Nos.156/2017 & 157/2017. 3. The claimants Uttam...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 3 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment on Jan. 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 05TH JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2201 of 2025 Harendra alias Bittu Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate, with Mrs. Gyan Mati Kushwaha, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Tumul Nainwal, Assistant Government Advocate. Hon'ble Alok...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 3 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. Heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel representing the appellants. Also heard Mr. M. Ahmed and Mr. N.J. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. These batch of applications are under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act challenging the judgment and award dated 21.09.2020 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.1, Kamrup (M) in MAC Case Nos.156/2017 & 157/2017. 3. The claimants Uttam...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 3 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment Jan. 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 05th JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2082 of 2025 Afzal Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Rajveer Singh, Advocate (through video conferencing). Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Tumul Nainwal, Assistant Government Advocate. Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J. Applicant...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 3 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. Heard Mr. S. Dutta, learned counsel representing the appellants. Also heard Mr. M. Ahmed and Mr. N.J. Gogoi, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. These batch of applications are under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act challenging the judgment and award dated 21.09.2020 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.1, Kamrup (M) in MAC Case Nos.156/2017 & 157/2017. 3. The claimants Uttam...
NAINITAL, India, Feb. 3 -- Uttarakhand High Court issued the following judgment Jan. 5: IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA 05TH JANUARY, 2026 FIRST BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2024 of 2025 Harendra alias Bittu Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand Respondent Counsel for the Applicant: Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate, with Mrs. Gyan Mati Kushwaha, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent: Mr. Tumul Nainwal, Assistant Government Advocate. Hon'ble Alok Ku...