PATNA, India, July 2 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on June 3: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners have filed the instant application for quashing of the F.I.R. of Bypass Police Station Case no.24/2025, registered for offences under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 324(4), 324(5), 303(2), 308(4) and 352 of the BNS, 2023. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have been falsely implicat...
PATNA, India, July 2 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on June 30: Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the appellants assisted by Mr. Pankaj Kumar and Mr. A. M. P. Mehta, learned APP for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that Bharat Prasad, Naresh Prasad @ Ram Naresh Prasad, Chhotak Prasad and Pramod Prasad have died during the pendency of the appeal. So, the appeal against them stands abated under the provision of Section 394 of the Code of Crimin...
PATNA, India, July 2 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on June 30: 1. The writ petition is filed for the following reliefs: "(i) for setting aside the show cause notice in memo no. 813 dated 22.09.2014 and also for quashing the order contained in memo no. 960 dated 15.11.2014 passed by learned S.D.O., Kishanganj by which he was pleased to cancelled the PDS license of the petitioner being license no. 18TR/2007 and also for quashing the order dated 20.06.2017 passed in PDS Appeal...
PATNA, India, July 2 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on June 30: 1. The Writ petition is filed for the following relief:- That this is an application for issuance of appropriate, writ(s), order(s), direction(s) for payment of admitted outstanding dues of Rs. 34,98,230/- out of total bill of Rs. 1,64,77,256/- (one crore sixty four lac seventy seven thousand two hundred fifty six only) with consequential order for the work for construction of 6000 capacity EVM Godown of Samasti...
PATNA, India, July 2 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on June 30: Heard the parties. 2. Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, learned Advocate for the petitioner presses interlocutory application, bearing I.A. No. 1 of 2023, with the contention that during the pendency of the present writ petition, the departmental proceeding initiated against the petitioner came to an end vide order dated 04.01.2021 whereby the petitioner has been inflicted with the punishment of dismissal. The aforesaid or...
PATNA, India, July 2 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on June 30: 1. The writ petition is filed to quash the order passed by the District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Muzaffarpur, PDS Appeal No. 6/2017 as well as to quash the order dated 29.09.2016 passed by the S.D.O., West Muzaffarpur, by which the PDS license of the petitioner was cancelled. 2. Heard the Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the Learned counsel for the respondents. 3. The Learned counsel for the respo...
PATNA, India, July 2 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on June 30: The challenge in the present writ petition is made to an order dated 31.07.2007 passed in Departmental proceeding no. 53 of 2006 whereby the petitioner has been inflicted with the punishment of withholding of one increment for a year. 2. During the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner came to know under the Right to Information Act that his appeal preferred against the original order also came to be rej...
PATNA, India, July 2 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on June 30: Heard Mr. Dhananjay Mishra, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Kunal Tiwary, learned Advocate for the North Bihar Power Distribution Company Ltd. 2. The challenge in the present writ petition is made to an order no. 472 dated 14.05.2010 by which the pension of the erstwhile employee (original petitioner) came to be reduced by 25%, with a further direction that the petitioner shall not be entitled to any...
PATNA, India, July 2 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on June 30: We have heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar, the learned Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Apurva Kumar, the learned Advocate for the State. 2. The appellant is aggrieved by the judgment dated 02.01.2023 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 1766 of 2018, whereby his writ petition stood dismissed. 3. The appellant was appointed on the post of Clerk by one Ram Yatan Paswan, but was removed from service wayback on 31.12.1996 on the ground ...
PATNA, India, July 2 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on June 30: We have heard Mr. Amarendra Narayan, the learned Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Anil Kumar Verma, the learned Advocate for the State. 2. The appellant served as GNM (General Nurse Midwifery), Fulparas for about five years (three months short), when she was transferred to Babubarahi on 30.06.2021. Shortly thereafter, she was again transferred to Jhanjharpur on 06.07.2021. 3. This transfer was challenged by t...