PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: Heard Mr. Arun Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy1, learned SC-13 appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner has filed this writ petition with the following prayers: 3. Counter affidavit has also been filed by the respondents. 4. By referring to Annexure-R/4 of the counter affidavit filed by the respondent no. 4, which is an Office Order issued by th...
PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner is the widow of the erstwhile employee who has invoked the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court on being aggrieved with the letter bearing Memo No. 24/2007/84 dated 25.01.2021(Annexure-8), whereby and whereunder the claim of the petitioner came to be rejected for payment of medical reimbursement to the tune of Rs.6,96,594/- which amount was spent in the right side Cochlear...
PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioners and Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned Advocate for the State. 2. The petitioners before this Court are aspirants for the post of District Home Guard in connection with Advertisement No. 1 of 2009. On being aggrieved with Memo No. 259 dated 15.03.2022 issued under the signature of the respondent District Magistrate-cum- Chairman District Selection ...
PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents-State. 2.This petition has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved with the order dated 16.08.2019 (Annexure-4) whereby and whereunder the services of the petitioner has been terminated and also challenged the order dated 05.03.2020 and 14.11.2022, Annexure nos. 6 and 8 respectively whereby and whereunder the appeal and mem...
PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: This petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs: 2 Brief facts of the case are that while the petitioner was posted as Jail Superintendent, an under trial prisoner died during the course of treatment at Sadar Hjospital, Purnea. For that, the petitioner was placed under suspension. The District Magistrate had constituted a Three Men Enquiry Committee and on the basis of the report ...
PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the 'BSFC'). Please improve the sentence. 2. The present writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent authorities to make payment of arrears of revised salary ar...
PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the Bihar State Power Holding Company Limited. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has been filed for quashing letter No. 242 dated 09.03.2016 communicating rejection of petitioner's representation and refusing to grant him pay and other allowances for the post of Director (I.T) for the period 24.04.2001 to 3...
PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: This petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking following reliefs:- 2. The brief facts of the case is that the respondent no.1 has invited on-line application from the eligible candidates for appointment against 550 vacant posts of Assistants in the Patna High Court, which are Group 'B' Posts in Level-7. A copy of the advertisement is brought on record as Annexure-1A to the writ petition. 3. Learned c...
RANCHI, India, July 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on June 6: 1. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant, at the outset, has sought for leave of this Court by not pressing the instant appeal. 2. Consequently, the instant first appeal being First Appeal No. 228 of 2019 stands disposed of as not pressed. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as counsel for the respondents. 2. This petition has been preferred by the petitioner being aggrieved with the order of dismissal dated 07.01.2021, Annexure - 4, whereby the petitioner has been dismissed from his services also, under challenge is the order dated 30.05.2021 (Annexure - 8) whereby appeal preferred by the petitioner has been rejected. 3. The brief fa...