PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. The present application has been preferred by the petitioners for quashing of FIR of Matihani P.S. Case No. 105/2022 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A), 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 3. The case of the prosecution in brief is that the informant/opposite party No. 2 married ...
PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: Heard Mr. Rana Sanjay, learned Advocate for the appellant and Mr. Dilip Kumar Sinha, learned APP for the Respondent-State. 2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 374 (2) read with 389 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as 'Code'), wherein the appellant has challenged the judgment of conviction dated 30.09.2024 and order of sentence dated 07.10.2024 rendered by learned Di...
PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: We have heard Dr. K.N. Singh, learned ASG for the appellant/Union of India and Mr. Rupak Kumar, learned Advocate for the respondent. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 20.06.2025, whereby the Director General, Sashastra Seema Bal, New Delhi has been directed to be personally present in Court. 3. The initial objection of Mr. Rupak Kumar, learned Advocate for the respondent is that this appeal is n...
PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: Re: I.A. No. 01 of 2022 Heard I.A. No. 01 of 2022 for condonation of delay. There is a delay of about 26 days in filing L.P.A. No.551 of 2022. 2. For the reasons stated in the application read with the affidavit, delay of about 26 days in filing L.P.A. No.551 of 2022 stands condoned. 3. Accordingly, I.A. No. 01 of 2022 stands allowed. LPA No. 551 of 2022 4. Appellant has assailed the order of the learned Single...
PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: Heard learned counsel for the appellant. None appears on behalf of the respondent. 2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 19 of the Family Court Act, 1984 impugning the judgment and decree dated 19.07.2023 passed by learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna in Matrimonial (Divorce) Case No. 1349 of 2021, whereby the matrimonial suit, preferred by the appellant, seeking dissolution of mar...
PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: Heard learned counsel for the appellant. None appears on behalf of respondent. 2. The present appeal has been filed under Section 19(1) of the Family Court Act, 1984 impugning the judgment and decree dated 03.01.2023 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Vaishali at Hajipur in Matrimonial (Divorce) Case No. 64 of 2022, whereby the matrimonial suit, preferred by the appellant, for a decree of 3. The ca...
PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: Heard learned counsel for the parties and I intend to dispose of the instant petition at the stage of admission itself. 2. The present civil miscellaneous petition has been filed against order dated 24.05.2018 passed by learned Sub Judge-XIII, Bhagalpur in Title Suit No. 841 of 2013 whereby and whereunder the petition dated 08.01.2018 filed on behalf of the intervenors/respondents 2nd set under Order 1 Rule 10(2)...
PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: The petitioner has preferred the instant civil miscellaneous petition being aggrieved by the order dated 28.08.2024 passed by learned District Judge, Sheohar in LA Case No. 21 of 2004, whereby and whereunder the learned trial court rejected the petition filed by the petitioner under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short 'the Code'). 2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts of the case are...
PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: The record taken up on mentioning being made on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and I intend to dispose of the instant petition at the stage of admission itself. 3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 10.07.2024 passed by the learned Munsif, Bettiah, West Champaran in Title Suit No. 67 of 2016 whereby and whereunder the learned trial court stayed the proceeding of...
PATNA, India, July 7 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on July 1: The record taken up on mentioning being made on behalf of the petitioner 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and I intend to dispose of the instant petition at the stage of admission itself. 3. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 13.10.2023 passed by the learned Sub Judge-1, Purnea in Money Execution Case No.10/2021 whereby and whereunder the application filed by the petitioner, who is judgmen...