RANCHI, India, Dec. 5 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 5: Heard the parties. Perusal of the record reveals that vide order dated 19.09.2025, time was granted to the petitioner as the last chance and today also learned counsel for the petitioner again prays for time. Prayer for time is allowed subject to deposit of Rs.1,000/- by the petitioner with the Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority (JHALSA) within four weeks from the date of this order, failing which, this ...
RANCHI, India, Dec. 5 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 5: No one turns up on behalf of the petitioner in spite of repeated calls. Accordingly, this case is dismissed for non-prosecution. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Dec. 5 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 5: 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed to complete the process of selection of the petitioners by enrollment and issuance of certificates of appointment as Home Guard in favour of the petitioner whose names have appeared in the final merit list, pursuant to Advertisement No. 01/2017 dated 27.12.2017. 3. The similar prayer was made by several writ p...
RANCHI, India, Dec. 5 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 5: 1. Heard the parties. 2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioner prays that the departmental proceeding, which has been initiated against him, be disposed of at the earliest. 3. Considering the nature of prayer, I am not inclined to keep this writ petition pending nor I am inclined to call for counter affidavit. 4. In that view, I direct the respondents to dispose of the Departmental Proceeding initia...
RANCHI, India, Dec. 5 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 5: 1. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:- i. For quashing of order dated 08.08.2020 contained in Letter No. 3630 issued by Respondent No. 2 whereby and whereunder claim of the petitioner for providing compassionate appointment on account of death of his father Lakhan Ray, P in No. 01239976, JNTA Koyla Nagar in harness, has been rejected. ii. For direction upon ...
RANCHI, India, Dec. 5 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 5: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have directed the petitioner to submit the Pension Payment Order, Aadhar Card, PAN Card, Bank Passbook and Photographs vide letter dated 17.3.2025, Annexure-10, to this writ petition. It is his contention that the said direction was given in terms of order passed in CMP No. 918 of 2022, but no final order has been passed. 3....
RANCHI, India, Dec. 5 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 5: 1. Heard the parties. 2. By filing this writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for making payment of overtime work, which they have done to conduct Census, conducted by the Ranchi Municipal Corporation in the year 2011. 3. It is the case of the petitioners that during the said period i.e. in the year 2011, the petitioners being the employees of CMPDI, had worked and had taken part in census process and h...
RANCHI, India, Dec. 5 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 5: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioners in this petition prays for a direction in a nature of Mandamus commanding upon the respondent authorities to revise and refix the benefits and grant them DACP and consequential benefits as per the 5th and 6th Pay Revision from 05.04.2002 and 29.10.2008 in light of the observations made in order dated 02.08.2023 passed by the Division Bench in L.P.A. No.86 of 2018. They ...
RANCHI, India, Dec. 5 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 5: 1. In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief: "directing the respondents to grant permission to re-marry without holding pension and to take final decision upon application dated 21.12.2024." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as his representation is already pending before the respondents, suffice it would be, if a direction is given to the respondents to conside...
RANCHI, India, Dec. 5 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Nov. 5: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioners are seeking appointment in Class-IV Post. They have also challenged the order by which their appointment has been rejected. 3. Without entering into other aspects, I find that it is an admitted fact that the age of the petitioners is more than 40 years. It is also admitted that their age is more than the upper age limit prescribed for appointment. 4. Considering the...