IMPHAL, India, April 14 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on March 12: Due to paucity of time, hearing of this case cannot be taken up today. On the joint request made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, list this case again on 14.05.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
IMPHAL, India, April 14 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on March 12: [1] Ms. Roshni, learned counsel for respondent Nos. 7 & 9, prays for two weeks' time for filing counter affidavit. [2] Mr. M. Hemchandra, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Gunapriya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. S. Niranjan, learned G.A., have no objection. [3] List this case on 27.04.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
IMPHAL, India, April 14 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on March 12: Present Mr. H.S. Paonam, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Malemleima H., learned counsel and Mr. Anjan Prasad Sahu, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners/applicants; Mr. Th. Sukumar, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State respondents; Mr. S. Suresh, learned counsel for Principal Accountant General (A&E), Manipur; and Mrs. Ayangleima, learned counsel on behalf of MPS...
IMPHAL, India, April 14 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on March 12: Present Mr. H.S. Paonam, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Malemleima H., learned counsel; Mr. S. Lokhendro, learned counsel; and Mr. Anjan Prasad Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioners/applicants; Mrs. R.K. Emily, learned Dy. Government Advocate for the State respondents and applicant in MC(WP(C)) No. 696 of 2025; and Mr. N. Ibotombi, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. Y. Jinita, learned counsel o...
IMPHAL, India, April 14 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on March 12: Present Mr. T. Momo, learned senior counsel assisted by Ms. N. Diana, learned counsel for the petitioners; Mrs. R.K. Emily, learned Dy. Government Advocate for the State respondents; and Mr. Stephen P., learned counsel for the private respondent in WP(C) No. 99 of 2021. Due to paucity of time, these matters cannot be taken up today. List these cases on 15-04-2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
IMPHAL, India, April 14 -- Manipur High Court issued the following order on March 12: [1] Mr. M. Rustam, learned counsel for respondent No. 1 requests for time. [2] Request acceded to. [3] List on 14.05.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, April 14 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 13: 1. In all these writ petitions, a common question of fact and law is involved and therefore, they are heard analogously and disposed of by this common order. 2. A common grievance of the petitioners in this batch of writ petitions is with regard to grant of annual increment which became due on completion of one year's service before attaining the age of superannuation. In some of the cases,...
JABALPUR, India, April 14 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 13: 1. In all these writ petitions, a common question of fact and law is involved and therefore, they are heard analogously and disposed of by this common order. 2. A common grievance of the petitioners in this batch of writ petitions is with regard to grant of annual increment which became due on completion of one year's service before attaining the age of superannuation. In some of the cases,...
JABALPUR, India, April 14 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 13: 1. In all these writ petitions, a common question of fact and law is involved and therefore, they are heard analogously and disposed of by this common order. 2. A common grievance of the petitioners in this batch of writ petitions is with regard to grant of annual increment which became due on completion of one year's service before attaining the age of superannuation. In some of the cases,...
JABALPUR, India, April 14 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 13: 1. In all these writ petitions, a common question of fact and law is involved and therefore, they are heard analogously and disposed of by this common order. 2. A common grievance of the petitioners in this batch of writ petitions is with regard to grant of annual increment which became due on completion of one year's service before attaining the age of superannuation. In some of the cases,...