RANCHI, India, March 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. On the instruction of the client, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Learned counsel for the other side has raised no objection. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, March 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. In instant writ application the petitioner has prayed for a direction upon the respondent-authorities to consider the case of petitioner for promotion with due date in respective grades with all consequential benefits in view of the fact that juniors to him in another colliery have been promoted. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per Company's Rules for Promotion, an employee is entitl...
RANCHI, India, March 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. The instant interlocutory application has been filed for withdrawal of the present writ petition as the Appellate Tribunal is functional. 2. In view of above fact, I.A. No.1399 of 2026 is, hereby, allowed. 3. Consequently, the present writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. 4. Pending I.A., if any, also stands disposed of. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, March 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. The present writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- "i. For issuance of appropriate writs)/ order(s)/ quashing the Order No. 40, Memo No. 1050; Order No.15, Memo No. 1025; Order No. 33, Memo No. 1048; Order No. 43, Memo No. 1053; Order No. 39, Memo No. 1049; Order No. 49, Memo No. 1039; Order No. 25, Memo No. 1032 and Order No. 23, Memo No. 1034; Order No. 27, Memo No. 1037; Order No. 26,...
RANCHI, India, March 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. The instant application has been preferred by the petitioner praying therein for quashing the order dated 27.03.1985. 2. From bare perusal of the impugned order, it appears that the petitioner was appointed on compassionate ground in the year 1984 and since his work was not found acceptable, he has been terminated from service vide order dated 27.03.1985. 3. In any view of the matter, from the records i...
RANCHI, India, March 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard, learned counsel for the parties. 2. The petitioner prays for consideration of her claim for compassionate appointment on the ground that the mother-in-law of the petitioner who was the Aaganwadi Sevika died while working. 3. Admittedly, there is Rule which provides for grant of compassionate appointment to the daughter-in-law of the deceased-Aaganwadi Sevika. 4. It is also the case that the cas...
RANCHI, India, March 2 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. Heard Ms. Neha Kumari, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 27.11.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Latehar in Misc. Criminal Application No. 815 of 2025, arising out of Latehar P.S. Case No. 236/2021, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. 3. It has been alleged that there w...
GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. The Death Sentence Ref. No. 5/2018, Crl. A. No. 342/2018, Crl. A. No. 358/2018, Crl. A. No. 93/2019 and Crl. A. No. 171/2019, have been heard together and are being disposed of by this Common Judgment and Order. 2. We have heard Mr K. Gogoi, learned Public Prosecutor, Assam, assisted by Mr. R. R. Kaushik, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, for the State in Death Sentence Ref. No. 5/2018 and Mr. ...
GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. The Intra-court Appeals challenge the common judgment & order dated 29.09.2023, passed in WP(C)/1931/2020 and in the other connected writ petitions. 2. The appellants were appointed as Grade-IV employees in the year 2004-2005 against substantive vacancies under the Joint Director, Health Services, Dibrugarh and Goalpara. They continued to serve until their services were terminated in 2019. All these appel...
GUWAHATI, India, March 2 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 30: 1. The Intra-court Appeals challenge the common judgment & order dated 29.09.2023, passed in WP(C)/1931/2020 and in the other connected writ petitions. 2. The appellants were appointed as Grade-IV employees in the year 2004-2005 against substantive vacancies under the Joint Director, Health Services, Dibrugarh and Goalpara. They continued to serve until their services were terminated in 2019. All these appel...