SHILLONG, India, May 19 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following April 17: 1. Heard Mr. S. Thapa, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. H. Abraham learned GA for the respondents. 2. The writ petitioner who is stated to be serving as LDA in the office of the Block Development Officer, Ranikor C&RD Block, South West Khasi Hills, is before this Court praying for consideration for grant of promotion and also for release of consequential service benefits, such as increments, which is cla...
SHILLONG, India, May 19 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following April 17: 1. The petitioners who are permanent residents of Bolsalgre Village, South West Garo Hills District who claim to be the genuine land owners holding Pattas for their respective plots donated for the construction of the International Football Stadium, are before this Court praying for directions for grant of employment, in lieu of the donation that has been made. 2. Mr. S. Deb, learned counsel for the petitioners has...
SHILLONG, India, May 19 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following April 17: 1. Mr. G.Syngkrem, learned counsel for the petitioner today prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the instant writ petition, however, with liberty to file afresh, if so advised. 2. Mr. M.L.Nongpiur, learned counsel for the respondents No.1-4 and Mr. J.Shylla, learned counsel for the respondent No. 6 have no objections. 3. Accordingly, the matter stands closed and disposed of on withdrawal, however, with libert...
SHILLONG, India, May 19 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following April 17: 1. This contempt application has been filed alleging violation of the order dated 20-03-2025, passed in WP(C). No. 290 of 2024 whereby the undisputed amount payable to the writ petitioner had been directed to be paid expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of the order. 2. The Chief Engineer, PHE has filed an affidavit which indicates that there has been no wilful violation or disregar...
SHILLONG, India, May 19 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following April 17: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith with the consent of the parties and the aforesaid petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. Mr S. Sengupta, learned Addl PP waives notice on behalf of the respondent No. 1 and Ms N.M. Kharshemlang, learned counsel waives notice on behalf of the respondent No. 2. 4. By this petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the FIR re...
SHILLONG, India, May 19 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following April 17: 1. Mr. M.L. Nongpiur, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that pursuant to this Court's order dated 26.03.2026, the petitioners have deposited the amount before the concerned authorities, and the receipt issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, acknowledging such deposit, has also been placed before this Court today, the same is brought on record and marked as Annexure-X. 2. In view of such develo...
CUTTACK, India, May 19 -- Orissa High Court issued the following order on April 17: 1. Since the issues raised in both the above-mentioned CRLMCs involve common question of fact and law, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment. For the sake of convenience and effective adjudication, CRLMC No.1589 of 2025 is treated as the lead case. 2. The Petitioner, through the present CRLMC, calls in question the order dated 16.01.2023 passed by the learned Special Ju...
CUTTACK, India, May 19 -- Orissa High Court issued the following order on April 17: 1. The Petitioner, in the present petition, seeks quashing of the FIR No.329 of 2021 dated 11.10.2021 corresponding to CT Case No.869 of 2021 pending before the learned JMFC, Balasore. I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE: 2. The brief facts of the case are as follows: i. The Petitioner is the mother of Opposite Party No.3. The Opposite Party No.2 and the Opposite Party No.3 got married each other on 04.02.2018 at ...
CUTTACK, India, May 19 -- Orissa High Court issued the following order on April 17: 1. In this petition, the petitioner seeks a direction to set aside the order dated 27.06.2022 passed in S.T. Case No.138 of 2012, whereby the learned trial court, in exercise of power under Section 319 CrPC, arraigned the petitioner as an additional accused and directed fresh trial proceedings. I. FACTUAL MATRIX OF THE CASE: 2. The brief facts of the case are as follows: (i) The case arises out of Fategarh ...
CUTTACK, India, May 19 -- Orissa High Court issued the following order on April 17: 1. Since the issues raised in both the above-mentioned CRLMCs involve common question of fact and law, those were heard analogously and are being disposed of by this common judgment. For the sake of convenience and effective adjudication, CRLMC No.1589 of 2025 is treated as the lead case. 2. The Petitioner, through the present CRLMC, calls in question the order dated 16.01.2023 passed by the learned Special Ju...