SHILLONG, India, April 14 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 12: On the request of Ms. P. S. Nongbri, learned counsel appearing for the respondents, list this matter on 07.04.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
SHILLONG, India, April 14 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 12: At the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, stand over to 10th April, 2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
SHILLONG, India, April 14 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 12: 1. The aforesaid petition is placed before us pursuant to the reference made by the learned Single Judge (Hon'ble B. Bhattacharjee, J) vide order dated 12th June, 2024, in view of his disagreement with the judgment and order dated 23rd March, 2022 passed by the coordinate Bench (Hon'ble W. Diengdoh, J) in Crl Petn No. 63 of 2021. 2. Although, the learned Single Judge has not framed the issue for...
SHILLONG, India, April 14 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 12: 1. The petitioners who are presently serving as Sub-Divisional Officers/Assistant Engineers (Civil) in the PHE Department of the Government of Meghalaya by way of the instant writ petition are seeking rectification of the gradation list dated 14.02.2024, to show them senior to the respondents Nos. 4 & 5. The ground on which the rectification is sought is that the petitioners except for the petitio...
SHILLONG, India, April 14 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 12: 1. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed in the year 1993 as Laboratory Technician in the Department of Health & Family Welfare after being recommended by the Departmental Selection Committee. The services of the petitioner was then confirmed in the year 2019 by the Director of Health Services (MI), but strangely vide order dated 18.03.2023, the respondent No. 3 issued ...
SHILLONG, India, April 14 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 12: 1. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed in the year 1993 as Laboratory Technician in the Department of Health & Family Welfare after being recommended by the Departmental Selection Committee. The services of the petitioner was then confirmed in the year 2019 by the Director of Health Services (MI), but strangely vide order dated 18.03.2023, the respondent No. 3 issued ...
SHILLONG, India, April 14 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 12: 1. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed in the year 1993 as Laboratory Technician in the Department of Health & Family Welfare after being recommended by the Departmental Selection Committee. The services of the petitioner was then confirmed in the year 2019 by the Director of Health Services (MI), but strangely vide order dated 18.03.2023, the respondent No. 3 issued ...
SHILLONG, India, April 14 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 12: 1. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed in the year 1993 as Laboratory Technician in the Department of Health & Family Welfare after being recommended by the Departmental Selection Committee. The services of the petitioner was then confirmed in the year 2019 by the Director of Health Services (MI), but strangely vide order dated 18.03.2023, the respondent No. 3 issued ...
SHILLONG, India, April 14 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 12: 1. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was appointed in the year 1993 as Laboratory Technician in the Department of Health & Family Welfare after being recommended by the Departmental Selection Committee. The services of the petitioner was then confirmed in the year 2019 by the Director of Health Services (MI), but strangely vide order dated 18.03.2023, the respondent No. 3 issued ...
SHILLONG, India, April 14 -- Meghalaya High Court issued the following judgment/order on March 12: 1. The instant review application has been filed seeking review of the judgment and order dated 24-11-2025, passed by this Court in WP(C). No. 81 of 2024, whereby it was held that the order in appeal dated 21-12-2023, passed by the Executive Committee was incompetent as it was signed by only a single member of the Executive Committee. 2. Mr. K.Paul, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Ms. K.Decruse, ...