MUMBAI, India, June 11 -- Reserve Bank of India issued the following press release: (Amount in ₹ crore, Rate in Per cent) MONEY MARKETS@ -- > Money Markets@ Volume (One Leg) Weighted Average Rate Range A. Overnight Segment (I+II+III+IV) 7,19,127.92 5.18 4.00-5.50 I. Call Money 18,967.63 5.28 4.60-5.40 II. Triparty Repo 5,17,947.65 5.18 5.10-5.35 III. Market Repo 1,75,986.34 5.17 4.00-5.35 IV. Repo in Corporate Bond 6,226.30 5.28 5.25-5.50 B. Term Segment I. Notice Money** 179.00 5.09...
AMARAVATI, India, June 10 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on May 11: 1. Heard Sri K.S.Murthy, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri D.Prakasam Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant in W.A.No.205 of 2014; Sri G.Rama Chandra Rao, learned counsel for the appellants in W.A.No.259 of 2014; Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition in W.A.No.848 of 2022; Sri G.R.Sudhakar, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.No.26568 of 2014 and Sri V. Sudhakar Reddy,...
AMARAVATI, India, June 10 -- Andhra Pradesh High Court issued the following order on May 11: 1. Heard Sri K.S.Murthy, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri D.Prakasam Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant in W.A.No.205 of 2014; Sri G.Rama Chandra Rao, learned counsel for the appellants in W.A.No.259 of 2014; Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Land Acquisition in W.A.No.848 of 2022; Sri G.R.Sudhakar, learned counsel for the petitioners in W.P.No.26568 of 2014 and Sri V. Sudhakar Reddy,...
PATNA, India, June 10 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on May 11: 1. Service report shows that Opposite Party No. 2, who is himself an Advocate, has personally received the notice. There is, however, no appearance on behalf of Opposite Party No. 2. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 3. The instant application has been filed on behalf of the petitioners for quashing the order dated 18.05.2022 passed...
PATNA, India, June 10 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on May 11: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. Petitioners seek quashing of the order of cognizance dated 30.05.2022 passed in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 368 of 2020 by which the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul has taken cognizance of the offences under Sections 420, 447, 353/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The order was passed in CW...
PATNA, India, June 10 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on May 11: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks quashing of the order of cognizance dated 13.09.2018 passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur, in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 37 of 2016, whereby cognizance was taken of offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 420 and 120-B of the Indian Penal C...
PATNA, India, June 10 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on May 11: 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned APP for the State. 2. The instant application has been filed on behalf of the petitioners for quashing the order dated 13.07.2022 passed by learned S.D.J.M., Siwan in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 05 of 2018; G.R. No. 136 of 2018, whereby and where under the learned S.D.J.M., Siwan has been pleased to take cognizance against the above named ...
PATNA, India, June 10 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 11: 1. Heard the parties. 2. Issue notice to the opposite party no. 02 under registered cover with A/D as well as ordinary process for which requisites etc. must be filed within a week from today. 3. List this case after six weeks. 4. In the meantime, call for the legible photocopy of the entire/up-to-date case diary from the concerned Court below in connection with Araria Sangram P.S. Case No. 77 of 2025. Also ca...
PATNA, India, June 10 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 11: 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned Spl. P.P. for the State, Sri Sadanand Paswan. 2. This is an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the "SC/ST Act") against the refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail vide order dated 9-9-2025 in A.B.P. No. 4279 of 2025 passed by the learned Exclusive Special ...
PATNA, India, June 10 -- Patna High Court issued the following order on May 11: 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The present memo of appeal is directed against the order and judgment dated 21.10.2024 / 25.10.2024 passed by Shri Kamla Prasad, Additional Sessions Judge- IInd, Civil Court, Jamui in Tr. No. 1592 / 2022, Registration No. 555/2022 arising out of Sono (Charka Pathar) P.S. Case No.- 138/2022 whereby the...