RANCHI, India, April 18 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 17: 1. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:- (a) Direction upon the respondents to ensure peaceful vacant possession of the land in issue ad measuring 225 Sq. Ft. (15 ft x 15 ft) pertaining to M.S. Plot No.241, Ward No.2, Ratu Road Junction, P.O.- GPO, P.S. Kotwali, which was duly allotted to the petitioner vide Letter No.2947 dated 23.12.2006 but in spite o...
RANCHI, India, April 18 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 17: 1. Heard, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the respondent-NHAI. 2. Petitioner has prayed to quash the Annexure- 5, which is an order passed by District Land Acquisition Officer, Ramgarh, whereby the claim of the petitioner in respect of payment of compensation in lieu of acquisition of land has been denied. 3. After hearing the parties, I find that...
RANCHI, India, April 18 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 17: 1. Mr. Gopal K. Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner on instruction of his client seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition to avail the statutory remedy of appeal available to the petitioner. 2. Prayer is allowed. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4. If an application for condoning the delay is filed, the Appellate Authority will...
RANCHI, India, April 18 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 17: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the parties agree that these writ petitions can be disposed of by a common order. They point out that the material facts in all these writ petitions are substantially same, though the actual quantities or amounts involved may differ. Accordingly, we propose to dispose of these writ petitions by a common order by treating W.P.(C) No.1601 of 20...
RANCHI, India, April 18 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 17: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the parties agree that these writ petitions can be disposed of by a common order. They point out that the material facts in all these writ petitions are substantially same, though the actual quantities or amounts involved may differ. Accordingly, we propose to dispose of these writ petitions by a common order by treating W.P.(C) No.1601 of 20...
RANCHI, India, April 18 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 17: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the parties agree that these writ petitions can be disposed of by a common order. They point out that the material facts in all these writ petitions are substantially same, though the actual quantities or amounts involved may differ. Accordingly, we propose to dispose of these writ petitions by a common order by treating W.P.(C) No.1601 of 20...
RANCHI, India, April 18 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 17: 1. Ms. Amrita Sinha, who appears along with Mr. Sidharth Sudhanshu, learned counsel for the petitioner, on instruction, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail of the alternate remedy of appeal by raising all contentions as have been raised in this petition. 2. Leave is granted and this petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 3. All contentions of all parties ...
RANCHI, India, April 18 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 17: 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties including the learned counsel for the informant, namely, Nimai Pandit, S/o Pandu Pandit, who is also the sole victim in the present case. 2. This appeal has been filed for setting aside the judgment of conviction dated 02.08.2005 and sentence dated 03.08.2005 passed in Sessions Case No.206/1999 corresponding to Sessions Case No.12/2001 by the ...
RANCHI, India, April 18 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 17: 1. Heard the parties. 2. This criminal appeal has been filed under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 with the prayer to quash the cognizance order dated 11.12.2020 passed by the learned A.J.C.-VII-cum-Spl. Judge, SC/ST, Ranchi in connection with SC/ST (Complaint) Case No. 08 of 2019. 3. Perusal of the record reveals that this criminal appeal has...
RANCHI, India, April 18 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on March 17: Heard, learned counsel for the parties. 1. Both the aforesaid Cr. Appeal (SJ) have been filed under Section 14A (1) of the Schedule Castes and the Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015. 2. Since both the aforesaid Cr. Appeals (SJ) are directed against the separate orders by which prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellants was rejected in connection with the same case i.e. Bha...