RANCHI, India, Oct. 16 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 15: 1. Appellant is the Insurance Company and is before this Court against the judgment of award and compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act by the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal in Claim Case No.60/2010, whereby and whereunder the liability to pay compensation has been fixed on the Insurance Company. 2. Factum of accident or the insurance is not in dispute. 3. Appeal is preferred mainly on the...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 16 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 15: 1. The instant Misc. Appeal has been preferred against the judgment of compensation dated 25.03.2010 passed by learned 5th Addl. District Judge-cum-Addl. Motor Accident Claim Tribunal (FTC), Dumka, in Title Claim Suit No.58 of 2008, whereby and whereunder, the liability has been fixed on the present appellant to pay compensation amount under Section 166 of the M.V. Act. 2. Learned Tribunal held that the off...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 16 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 15: 1. Despite service of notice, the respondent no. 1 has failed to put in appearance. 2. We have gone through the contents of the appeal and find that the issue in question as regards this Court is concerned is no longer res-integra and squarely covered by the judgment rendered by this Court in LPA No. 362 of 2024, titled M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd., and others v. Kailash Chandra Mukherjee and Anr decided on...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 16 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 15: 1. The instant Criminal Appeal is directed against the Judgment and Order of conviction and sentence dated 21.11.2002 and 23.11.2002, respectively passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court No. II), Civil Court, Gumla in S.T. No. 33 of 2001 whereby and whereunder the appellants namely Somra Oraon and Biri Oraon have been held guilty for the offence under Section 302/34 of the I...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 16 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 15: 1. After some argument, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant intends to not press the instant interlocutory application. 2. Such submission has been made in presence of the learned counsel appearing for the State as well as the learned counsel appearing for the informant who have raised no objection. 3. Accordingly, I.A No.11733 of 2025 stands dismissed as not pressed. Disclaimer: Curated by H...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 16 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 15: 1. Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, learned counsel appearing for the appellants and Mr. Manoj Kumar Mishra, learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. 2. The instant appeal has been preferred by above named appellants against the judgment of conviction dated 10.01.2003 and order of sentence dated 16.01.2003 passed by learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Deoghar in S.T. No.391 of 2001, whereby and whereunder the ap...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 16 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 15: 1. Heard Mr. Raja Ravi S. Singh, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Vishwanath Roy, learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 26.04.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Rajmahal in connection with B.P. No. 68 of 2025 arising out of Tinpahar P.S. Case No. 07 of 2025, whereby and whereunder the prayer for bail of the appellant has be...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 16 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 15: 1. Heard Mr. Navin Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mrs. Priya Shrestha, learned Spl.P.P. for the State. 2. The instant appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 31.10.2002 and order of sentence dated 01.11.2002 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Fast Track, Sahibganj in Sessions Case No. 293 of 1993, whereby and whereunder, this appellant along wi...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 16 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 15: 1. Both the appeals are arising out of common judgment passed in S.T. No. 1110/2001 by learned Sessions Judge, Garhwa whereby and whereunder all the above named appellants have been held guilty for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. 2. We have heard the arguments advanced on behalf of learned counsel for the appellants Mr. A.K. Ka...
RANCHI, India, Oct. 16 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Sept. 15: 1. Both the appeals are arising out of common judgment passed in S.T. No. 1110/2001 by learned Sessions Judge, Garhwa whereby and whereunder all the above named appellants have been held guilty for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life. 2. We have heard the arguments advanced on behalf of learned counsel for the appellants Mr. A.K. Ka...