JABALPUR, India, Feb. 7 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Jan. 8: 1.Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 04.10.2025 whereby the respondents, apart from terminating the contract, have also passed an order of debarment of the petitioner for participating in any tender by Railway division for a period of two years. 2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that insofar as the wrongful termination of the contract is concerned, since there is an alter...
JABALPUR, India, Feb. 7 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Jan. 8: 1. Petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 30.09.2025 whereby the respondents, apart from terminating the contract, have also passed an order of debarment of the petitioner for participating in any tender by Railway division for a period of two years. 2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that insofar as the wrongful termination of the contract is concerned, since there is an alte...
JABALPUR, India, Feb. 7 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Jan. 8: Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Feb. 7 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Jan. 8: 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of the petition, action has been taken by the department and illegal construction has been removed. He accordingly seeks leave to withdraw the petition. 2. Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. The respondent authority shall ensure that fresh encroachment does not take place on the said place. Disclaimer: Curated by HT S...
JABALPUR, India, Feb. 7 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Jan. 8: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order dated 26.09.2024 is consequently vacated. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Feb. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. Due to non-availability of Ms. Chandana Kumari, learned counsel for the appellant, an adjournment has been sought for by Mr. Aniket Kumar Ojha. 2. Let this matter be listed tomorrow i.e. on 07.01.2026. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
RANCHI, India, Feb. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. The instant appeal has been filed on behalf of the appellant/plaintiff under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 against the order/judgment dated 14.03.2023 [decree signed on 17.03.2023] passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Lohardaga in Original Suit No. 39 of 2022, whereby and whereunder, the said Suit filed by the appellant-husband under the provisions of Sections 27(1)(d) of Specia...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: Heard Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, learned Senior Counsel for the appellant and learned Spl. P.P. for the State. This appeal is directed against the order dated 17.12.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Pakur in connection with B.P. No. 378 of 2025, arising out of Hiranpur P.S. Case No. 105/2025, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: Heard Mr. Rajeeva Sharma, learned Senior Counsel for the appellants and learned Spl. P.P. for the State. This appeal is directed against the order dated 18.12.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Pakur in connection with A.B.P. No. 524 of 2025, arising out of Hiranpur P.S. Case No. 105/2025, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellants has been rejected. It has ...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 7 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 6: 1. Since both the appeal arises out of the common judgment of conviction dated 28.01.1998 and order of sentence dated 02.02.1998, as such, they have been tagged together and taken up together for analogous hearing and are being disposed of by this common order. Prayer: 2. Both the criminal appeals have been preferred under section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment of conviction da...