RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: Heard the learned counsel for the respective sides. This appeal is directed against the order dated 02.07.2025 passed in M.C.A. No. 1606 of 2025 arising out of S.T. Case No. 58 of 2025 (Haidernagar P.S. Case No. 52/2024 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Palamau at Daltonganj, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that some extremists ...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: Heard the learned counsel for the respective sides. This appeal is directed against the order dated 16.07.2025 passed in M.C.A. No. 1239 of 2025 arising out of Nimiyaghat P.S. Case No. 24/2019 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Giridih, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellants has been rejected. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellants that though...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: I.A. No. 10560 of 2025 Heard the learned counsel for the respective parties. This application has been preferred by the appellant for condoning a delay of 16 days in filing the appeal. Having been satisfied with the reasons assigned in this application, the delay of 16 days which had occurred in filing this appeal is condoned and this I.A. is allowed and disposed of. Criminal Appeal (DB) No. 948 of 202...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. Heard Mr. Sunil Kumar learned counsel for the appellant as well as Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. Instant criminal appeal is preferred by above named appellant for setting aside his judgment of conviction dated 22.08.2001 and order of sentence dated 23.08.2001 passed by learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Gumla in S.T. No. 300/1995 whereby and wh...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. Affidavit filed by the State reveals that appellant No. 1 namely, Beni Singh and appellant no. 4 namely, Ram Nath Ram @ Ram Nath Rautiya have died during pendency of this appeal. 2. Therefore, the appeal, so far as appellant no. 1 namely, Beni Singh and appellant no. 4 namely, Ram Nath Ram @ Ram Nath Rautiya is concerned, stands abated. 3. Now, the appeal is heard with respect to appellant nos. 2, 3, 5...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: Heard Mr. Vishal Srivastava, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mrs. Vandana Bharti, learned A.P.P. appearing for the State. This appeal is directed against the order dated 30.01.2025 passed in Cri. Misc. Application no. 111 of 2025 arising out of Chas P. S. Case No. 185 of 2022 corresponding to S. T. No. 496 of 2022 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Ist cum Special Judge, Bokaro whereby ...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. The instant appeal was preferred by seven appellants out of them, original appellants, Sitaram Mandal, Gopi Mandal, Harihar Mandal and Jethu Mandal had died during pendency of this appeal and their appeal has been abated vide order dated 24.04.2025. 2. This appeal is preferred for setting aside the judgment of conviction and sentence of the appellants dated 21.01.2003 passed by learned 3rd Additional Dis...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction dated 27.11.2002 and order of sentence dated 28.11.2002 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge Fast Track-II, Gumla in Session Trial No.270 of 1993, whereby and whereunder the appellants have been held guilty for the offences under Section 302 r/w Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and sentenced to undergo R.I. of life. 2. The instant appeal wa...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. Heard Mr. Amit Kumar Das, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Pandey Neeraj Rai, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. This Latest Patent Appeal is directed against the order dated 08-02-2013 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(S) No. 5388 of 2006 whereby and whereunder, the writ application preferred by the respondent herein for recall of his letter of resignation has been allow...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 24 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 25: 1. Despite service of notice, none has put appearance on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 6. Counsel for respondent No.7 is present. I.A. No. 13816 of 2024 2. For the reasons set out in the Interlocutory Application, which is duly supported by an affidavit filed by the Assistant Manager (Legal) of the appellants, we find sufficient cause to condone the delay of 192 days that has crept up in filing the Appea...