JABALPUR, India, Sept. 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 28: 1. Learned Deputy Advocate General submits that though learned Single Judge has said that the representation of the appellant shall be considered after he joins the place of posting, however, in view of the present appeal, the competent authority is considering the representation. He submits that a decision on the representation is likely to be taken very shortly. 2. In view of the above, th...
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 28: After some arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of the tender condition, he seeks leave to withdraw the petition, reserving the right of the petitioner, to participate in any subsequent tender process that may be initiated by the respondents. Petition, is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Interim order date...
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 28: Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner at this stage would be satisfied in case the representation dated 21.05.2025 filed by the petitioner is decided by the respondents keeping in view the provision of Rule 68 of the M.P. Minor Mineral Rules, 1996 and Rule 18 of the Sand Transportation Rules. Learned Senior Counsel also submits that liberty be granted to the petiti...
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 28: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition reserving the right of the petitioner to file a representation before the competent authority. In view of the above, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 28: Pursuant to the consent given by the parties that the disputes be referred to a sole arbitrator by order dated 30.07.2025. It was proposed that Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Former Judge of this Court be appointed as the sole arbitrator to adjudicate the claims and counter claims, if any arising out of the subject RFP Tender Document. The consent of Mr. Justice Virender Singh has been received....
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 28: Learned counsel for the parties agree that the facts of the case of petitioners is similar to the case of petitioners in Writ Petition No.6159/2022. It is conceded that by judgment dated 26.04.2022, Writ Petition No.6159/2022 has been disposed of issuing certain directions, which would be squarely applicable to the case of petitioners who, as per the petitioners, are identically situated. In...
JABALPUR, India, Sept. 28 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Aug. 28: In view of para 36 of order dated 22.8.2025 in Suo Moto Writ Petition (Civil) No.5/2025, which reads as under: 36. We are also informed that numerous writ petitions/suo moto petitions are pending in various High Courts, more or less dealing with common issues. Hence, the Registry shall seek information about such pending writ petitions from the Registrar Generals of all the High Courts, and ...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 28: 1. Heard the arguments of learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The instant second appeal is preferred against the judgment of affirmance, whereby and whereunder, the suit filed by the plaintiff has been dismissed by learned Trial Court and the First Appellate Court has also dismissed the appeal. 3. The appellant/plaintiff instituted Title Suit No.14 of 1990 for dec...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 28: 1. I have already heard the arguments advanced by Mr. Kundan Kr. Ambastha, learned counsel appearing for the appellants as well as Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. Instant second appeal has been preferred by original appellant Jewel Oraon (since deceased) and represented through legal representatives being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and decree d...
RANCHI, India, Sept. 28 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Aug. 28: 1. The matter relates to Sessions Trial No.06/2023, pending in the Court of the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XV-cum-FTC (CAW)-cumSpecial Court elected for MP/MLA-cum-Special Judge for Electricity Cases, Ranchi. 2. Mr. Ritesh Verma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on instruction of Mr. Anurag Kashyap, who is Advocate-on-Record, seeks permission to withdraw this petition. 3. Mr. Bho...