PATNA, India, Sept. 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 29: Heard the learned Advocates for the petitioners and the learned Advocates for the respondents. 2. In the bunch of the writ petitions, there are two sets of writ petitions; one set of teachers are 'Head Teachers' and another set of teachers are 'Head Masters'. Since the issue(s) in these writ petitions are one and identical, with the consent of the parties, all these writ petitions have been heard together and ...
PATNA, India, Sept. 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 29: Heard the learned Advocates for the petitioners and the learned Advocates for the respondents. 2. In the bunch of the writ petitions, there are two sets of writ petitions; one set of teachers are 'Head Teachers' and another set of teachers are 'Head Masters'. Since the issue(s) in these writ petitions are one and identical, with the consent of the parties, all these writ petitions have been heard together and ...
PATNA, India, Sept. 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 29: This Court has heard Mr. Ramakant Sharma, learned Senior Advocate with Mr. Arbind Kumar, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Sanjay Kumar, learned Advocate for the State. 2. The challenge in the present writ petition is made to an order contained in Memo No. 4106 dated 11.09.2020 passed by the Superintendent of Police, whereby the petitioner has been inflicted with the punishment of dismissal in depart...
PATNA, India, Sept. 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 29: 1.The Writ petition is filed for the following reliefs: "(a) Issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, direction/ directions, order/orders for directing the respondent Nos. 10 and 11 for payment of Rs. 15,06,000/- with interest of completion of works of Scheme No. 02 of 2015-16 and Scheme No. 05 of 2015-16 which has already been completed. (b) To grant such other consequential benefits or reliefs including the p...
PATNA, India, Sept. 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 29: Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief(s):- "1. That this is a petition seeking issuance of writ, order or direction in the nature of appropriate writ including the writ of mandamus for following reliefs:- iv. For issuing a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ setting aside the email dated 08.06.2023 whereby and whereunder the ...
PATNA, India, Sept. 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 29: Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief(s):- "A. For quashing/setting aside the 'Order of Reference' bearing no. L42011/4/2022-IR(DU) dated 15.02.2022 (Annexure 'P-1') issued by the Central Government in purported exercise of power conferred by Clause (d) of Sub-section (1) & sub-section (2A) of Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 194...
PATNA, India, Sept. 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 29: Heard Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Jai Prabhat Kishore, learned AC to SC-13 appearing on behalf of the State and Mr. Neeraj Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Bihar Public Service Commission. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the action of the Bihar Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as "the Commission") in not recommending t...
PATNA, India, Sept. 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 29: Heard Mr. Bindhyachal Singh, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner has moved the Court for the following reliefs: "i) For issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the punishment order contained in memo no. 8564 dated 31.05.2022 whereby the petitioner has been inflicted with the punishment of (i) censure for year 2019-20 and (ii) reducti...
PATNA, India, Sept. 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 29: The present Criminal Revisions Petition has been preferred by the Petitioner against the impugned Final Order dated 20.03.2021 passed by learned Principal Judge Family Court, Bhagalpur in Maintenance Case No. 15 of 2018, whereby learned Principal Judge has directed the Petitioner herein to pay Rs.7,000/- per month to his wife, who is the Opposite Party No.2 herein, towards her maintenance from the date of the o...
PATNA, India, Sept. 29 -- Patna High Court issued the following judgment on Aug. 29: Heard Mr. Ram Prakash Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ajay Mishra, learned APP for the State. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. for quashing of the order dated 25.05.2023 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nawada in Roh P.S. Case No. 03 of 2018, whereby and whereunder the learned Magistrate has taken cognizance ag...