RANCHI, India, Feb. 22 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 20: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Although, we have not called upon the appellant-husband, namely, Rajesh Agrawal, but he is also present in the Court. 3. Mr. Kaushik Sarkhel, learned counsel on the instruction of the appellant-husband, namely, Rajesh Agrawal has submitted that he does not intend to press this appeal, since, he is ready to make payment of the amount of permanent alimony determin...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 22 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 20: 1. There is a 167-day delay in instituting this appeal. 2. The reasons for the delay are usual. However, we condone the delay, as the learned counsel for the appellants submitted that this is a matter in which excessive interest has been awarded along with costs. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants also pointed out that sometime was spent to obtain a legal opinion and for the preparation of the appeal me...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 22 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 20: Heard Mr. Md. Faruque Ansari, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. This appeal is directed against the order dated 02.08.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Pakur in B.P. No. 219/2025 in connection with Pakur(T) P.S. Case No. 188/2025, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that the appellant was apprehended whil...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 22 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 20: Heard Mr. Akhouri Awinash Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and learned Spl. P.P. This appeal is directed against the order dated 09.10.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Giridih in M.C.A. No. 1946/2025 in connection with Nimiaghat P.S. Case No. 50/2020, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that one Prakash Marandi was...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 22 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 20: Heard Mr. Gautam Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. This appeal is directed against the order dated 16.12.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Dhanbad in B.P. No. 1021/2025 in connection with G.R.P.S. Case No. 124/2025, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. It has been alleged that several children who were being trafficked...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 22 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 20: 1. This criminal revision petition has been filed against the judgment dated 13.09.2024 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro in Original Maintenance Case No.116/2020. 2. Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners on instruction of Mr. Gautam Kumar, who is Advocate-on-Record, seeks permission to withdraw this petition. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the State ...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 22 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 20: 1. The matter relates to Special (POCSO) Case No.44/2019, corresponding to Telco P.S. Case No.84/2019, pending in the Court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-V-cum-Special Judge (POCSO), Jamshedpur. 2. Mrs. Nanda Kumari, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instruction of Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, who is Advocate-on-Record, seeks permission to withdraw this petition. 3. Mr. Bishambhar Shastr...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 22 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 20: 1. Heard Mr. S.N. Tamuli, the learned counsel representing the appellants as well as Mr. A. Saha, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. This is an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 22.10.2019 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sivasagar in MAC Case No.16/2016. 3. On 13.03.2015 at about 6 P.M., the deceased...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 22 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 20: 1. Heard Mr. R.C. Paul, the learned counsel representing the appellant Insurance Company as well as Mr. H. Das, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. This is an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment dated 15.06.2020 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal , Goalpara in MAC Case No.344/2016. 3. On 08.01.2016 at about 3.30 P.M., the...
GUWAHATI, India, Feb. 22 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Jan. 20: 1. Heard Mr. S. Dutta, the learned counsel representing the appellant Insurance Company as well as Ms. P. Barman, the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. This is an appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 against the judgment and award dated 11.09.2002 passed by the learned Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Barpeta in MAC Case No.148/2000. 3. On 01.04.2000, a truck beari...