CUTTACK, India, May 26 -- Orissa High Court issued the following order on April 23: 1. The petitioner assails the order dated 22.09.2025 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Additional Revision Court-IV, Odisha, Bhubaneswar in OSS Case No.664 of 2022 in dismissing the said case filed by him. 2. Facts of the case, briefly stated, are that one Radhu Nayak was the recorded tenant and owner in possession of land measuring Ac.1.00 dec. pertaining to Sabik Plot No. 552/774 under Sabik Khata No. 1...
CUTTACK, India, May 26 -- Orissa High Court issued the following order on April 23: 1. Both the writ applications involve common facts for which both were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. 2. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.34733 of 2025 seeks to challenge the order dated 28.07.2025 passed by the Additional Tahasildar, Bhubaneswar in Mutation Case No.12024 of 2025. The petitioner in W.P.(C) No.7001 of 2026 seeks to challenge the order dated 13.12.2024 passed by th...
CUTTACK, India, May 26 -- Orissa High Court issued the following order on April 23: 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks to withdraw this ABLAPL. A memo to that effect files in Court today. The same be kept on record. 3. Accordingly, the ABLAPL is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
CUTTACK, India, May 26 -- Orissa High Court issued the following order on April 23: 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 3. The Petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with NTPC P.S. Case No.29 of 2026, corresponding to G.R. Case No.236 of 2026, pending in the Court of learned SDJM, Talcher for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Sections 85/115(2)/296/3(5)/351(2) o...
CUTTACK, India, May 26 -- Orissa High Court issued the following order on April 23: 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 3. The Petitioners, apprehending their arrest in connection with Kalimela P.S. Case No.257 of 2025, corresponding to SPL. G.R. Case No.136 of 2024, pending in the Court of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Malkangiri for the alleged commission of offences punishable u...
CUTTACK, India, May 26 -- Orissa High Court issued the following order on April 23: 1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. 2. Recorded the submissions of Mr. Tripathy, learned counsel for the petitioners and State. Considering the FIR as at Annexure-1, the Court is inclined to direct the parties to go for a mediation as an element of settlement exists between them. 3. Accordingly, it is ordered. 4. In view of the above, petitioner No.1 and informant, namely, opposite party N...
JABALPUR, India, May 26 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 23: 1. These appeals are filed on behalf of the convicted appellants, viz., Santosh Ahirwar S/o Santu Ahirwar, Sohil @ Bhuru @Amit S/o Hidayat Khan, Monu Uike (Thakur) S/o Dhunu Uike (Thakur), Mohan Patel S/o Tarapad Patel, Madhu Yadav S/o Prahlad Yadav, Manish Yadav S/o Thamman Singh Yadav, Rajkumar Patel S/o Ravishankar Patel, Nitesh @ Jattu Vanshkar S/o Prakash Vanshkar, Kalyan Patel S/o Komal S...
JABALPUR, India, May 26 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 23: The issue involved in these petitions is identical, therefore, they are heard analogously and decided by this common order. For the sake of convenience, fact are taken from W.P.No.11973/2014. The present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking following reliefs : 1. To issue a writ in the nature of certiorari to quash the Notification dated 11.01.2008 w...
JABALPUR, India, May 26 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 23: 1. Heard on I.A. No.25481 of 2022, an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay. On due consideration, the aforesaid application is allowed. The delay of 109 days occurred in filing this appeal is hereby condoned. This appeal under Section 378(III) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the appellant/State assailing the judgment and order of...
JABALPUR, India, May 26 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on April 23: 1. These appeals are filed on behalf of the convicted appellants, viz., Santosh Ahirwar S/o Santu Ahirwar, Sohil @ Bhuru @ Amit S/o Hidayat Khan, Monu Uike (Thakur) S/o Dhunu Uike (Thakur), Mohan Patel S/o Tarapad Patel, Madhu Yadav S/o Prahlad Yadav, Manish Yadav S/o Thamman Singh Yadav, Rajkumar Patel S/o Ravishankar Patel, Nitesh @ Jattu Vanshkar S/o Prakash Vanshkar, Kalyan Patel S/o Komal ...