JABALPUR, India, Feb. 19 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Jan. 19: 1. Petitioner has filed this subject petition styled as a public interest litigation contending that there is large scale misuse of the public fund. 2. We note that there is no material as to substantiate the allegation. As per learned counsel for the petitioner, the bills were uploaded on the website and thus the petitioner has already made a complaint to the Lokayukta (Annexure P-5). 3. T...
JABALPUR, India, Feb. 19 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Jan. 19: Learned counsels for petitioners submit that in view of the subsequent orders passed by the Government, both the petitions have become infructuous. They further submit that the subsequent orders have been challenged in W.P.No.41569/2025 and contend that petitions be disposed of without prejudice to their rights and contentions in W.P.No.41569/2025. In view of the above, both the petitions are...
JABALPUR, India, Feb. 19 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Jan. 19: Learned counsels for petitioners submit that in view of the subsequent orders passed by the Government, both the petitions have become infructuous. They further submit that the subsequent orders have been challenged in W.P.No.41569/2025 and contend that petitions be disposed of without prejudice to their rights and contentions in W.P.No.41569/2025. In view of the above, both the petitions are...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 19 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 19: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner praying for a direction upon the respondent authorities to pay the petitioner the pay-scale of Class-III on the ground of equal pay for equal work from 29.07.1994 till date in view of the fact that he is working continuously on Class-III post though he was appointed on Class-IV post and the petition...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 19 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 19: 1. Heard, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned counsels appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsels appearing on behalf of the JSSC. 2. The issue involved and sought to be raised in this writ petition has already been decided by Hon'ble Coordinate Single Bench of this Court in W.P.(S) No. 582 of 2023 (Mina Kumari Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Others along with Analogous Cas...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 19 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 19: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner prays for retrospective promotion to the post of Head Clerk. 3. It is admitted that the petitioner has already superannuated in the year 2025. The petitioner superannuated from the post of Clerk. Now has approached this Court making a prayer that he should have been promoted to the post of Head Clerk from 22.03.2013 i.e., that date, according to him, he was eligible ...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 19 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 19: 1. Heard the parties. 2. The petitioners, in this writ petition, pray for a direction upon the respondents not to take any action to terminate the contract of the petitioners even after completion of the seven years of service, as they are supposed to work till 31st May, 2027. 3. The issue of contractual service tenure of the persons who are employed in "Special Auxillary Police Force" (SAP) has already be...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 19 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 19: 1. Heard the parties. 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner has not been promoted for a single occasion, thus he is entitled for the benefit of ACP/MACP which are also not been granted to the petitioner in his entire tenure. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that he has already now superannuated. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submits that the petitioner sho...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 19 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 19: 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. I.A. No.3464 of 2025 seeks condonation of delay of 63 days for instituting this appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 (hereinafter to be referred as 'the said Act') 3. However, learned counsel for the respondent points out that when this appeal was filed 63 days beyond the prescribed period of limitation, the same was not accompanied by any ap...
RANCHI, India, Feb. 19 -- Jharkhand High Court issued the following order on Jan. 19: 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel appearing for the informant. 2. IA No. 12781 of 2025 has been filed for condoning the delay of 28 days in filing of the revision petition. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner due to livelihood residing at Jamshedpur and when it has come to the knowledge ...