GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 22 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 22: A submission has been made by the Mr. A. Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter has become infructuous. Mr. P. Nayak, learned Additional AG appearing for the respondent has not objected to the same. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed as infructuous. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 22 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 22: As prayed for by Mr. B.P. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner, matter stands adjourned for a week to enable him to obtain up-to-date instructions from his client. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 22 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 22: It has been submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the parties that the issue concerned in this writ petition has been decided by this Court by order dated 22.12.2022 passed in WP(C)/5470/2021. We have gone through the issue in the writ petition and the order dated 22.12.2022. In view of the submission that this matter stands squarely covered by the aforesaid judgment, nothing remains to be adjudicat...
GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 22 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 22: The learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. D. Das, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that despite best efforts, they have failed to associate any contact with the writ petitioner. She, therefore, prays for some time to take further appropriate steps in the matter. Prayer not being objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents, list this matter after 2 (two) weeks f...
GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 22 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 22: Heard Md. S. Huda, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. S. Baruah, learned CGC; Mr. G. Sarma, learned Standing Counsel for the FT matters and NRC; Mr. H. Kuli, learned counsel on behalf of Mr. A.I. Ali, learned Standing Counsel for the ECI; and Mr. P. Sarmah, learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate for the State respondent. Argument is concluded. Judgment and Order is reserved. Disclaimer: ...
GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 22 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 22: Mr. A. K. Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there are options of outside court settlement on the issue in the matter, and he has also submitted that he has taken the consent of the learned counsel for the respondents to pray for adjournment for 3 (three) weeks. Prayer is allowed. Let this matter be listed after 3 (three) weeks, on a date to be fixed by the Registry. Disclaimer: Cu...
GUWAHATI, India, Nov. 22 -- Gauhati High Court issued the following order on Oct. 22: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, who prays for an adjournment of the matter, to which Mr. A. Das, the learned counsel for the respondents, has raised no objection. Prayer is allowed. List the matter after 2(two) weeks. In the meantime, the Registry is hereby directed to reflect the name of Mr. A. Das, learned counsel for the respondents, in the cause list. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndica...
JABALPUR, India, Nov. 22 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Oct. 27: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the passage of time the petition has become infructuous. He accordingly seeks leave to withdraw the same. The petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Nov. 22 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Oct. 27: Learned counsel for petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petition reserving the right of detenue to approach the concern court for grant of regular bail. The petition is accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. All rights and contentions of the parties are reserved. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....
JABALPUR, India, Nov. 22 -- Madhya Pradesh High Court issued the following judgment/order on Oct. 27: Learned counsel for petitioner submits that after filing of the petition, order has been duly complied with by the Tehsildar. Accordingly, he does not wish to press the petition any further. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Disclaimer: Curated by HT Syndication....